Perovskite oxides with general formula AMO 3 have a large variety of applications as dielectrics and piezoelectrics, [1] ferroelectrics [2] and/or ferromagnetic materials, [3] among others. Rare earth and alkaline earth metal perovskites are useful as catalysts for hydrogen generation, [4] as oxidation catalysts for hydrocarbons, [5] and as effective and inexpensive electrocatalysts for state-of-the-art fuel cells, [6] mainly due to the possibility of tuning their mixed ionic-electronic conductivity through substitution of A and M and subsequent formation of oxygen vacancies. Despite the general interest in perovskites, so far there have been no ab initio studies devoted to their formation energies, and the trends in stability are unknown.Among the available theoretical techniques to investigate perovskites, DFT is an appealing candidate, since it has proved useful for understanding metals and alloys at the atomic scale.[7] Nevertheless, the well-known shortcoming of DFT in describing strongly correlated systems has prevented its use for the estimation of properties such as band gaps and electron localization-delocalization of oxides, and there are numerous corrections. [8] Despite these limitations, Figure 1 a shows the experimental formation energies from elements and O 2 of 20 perovskites at 298 K and the corresponding standard DFT energies using the RPBE-GGA [9] exchange-correlation functional. The simulations are able to reproduce trends in the formation energies, and the calculated energies are shifted by about 0.75 eV compared to experiments. The A component is Y, La, Ca, Sr, or Ba, while M is a 3d metal from Ti to Cu. However, it is possible to combine the formation energies of these compounds with those of their sesquioxides (A 2 O 3 and M 2 O 3 ), rutile dioxides (MO 2 ), monoxides (AO and MO), and O 2 to reproduce the energetics of several reactions (Figure 1 b-d). The reactions are shown in the Supporting Information. The excellent correspondence between experiments and theory shows that DFT very accurately captures the mixing energies between oxides. The chemical reaction depicted in Figure 1 a and the way of representing its Gibbs energy, are given by Equations (1) and (2).In terms of trends the agreement is beyond the expected accuracy of DFT in general, but the shift is about 0.75 eV. We note that imitations in O 2 description by DFT are well known and some alternatives have been proposed, obtaining remarkable agreements with experiments. [8c,10] We obtain the total DFT energy of O 2 indirectly from the tabulated Gibbs energy of formation of water and from the DFT energies of H 2