2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep35843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Calculation among Cerium, Oxygen, and Sulfur in Liquid Iron

Abstract: Thermodynamic calculation has been applied to predict the inclusion formation in molten SS400 steel. When the Cerium addition in liquid iron is 70 ppm and the initial Oxygen and Sulphur are both 110 ppm, the formation of oxides containing Cerium would experience the transformation from Ce2O3 to CeO2 and also the formation of sulfides containing Cerium would experience the transformation from CeS to Ce2S3 and then to Ce3S4. Below 2000 K the most thermodynamic stable matter is CeO2 and the less thermodynamic sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they just compared the size distribution of deoxidation products of MgO, ZrO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , CaO-Al 2 O 3 and MnO-SiO 2 in an Fe-10mass%Ni alloy. In spite of many experiments performed to investigate the formation mechanism and composition control of particles in steel by thermodynamic and kinetic theories 34 36 , limited studies about the effect of melt composition on the nucleation and growth of particles are conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they just compared the size distribution of deoxidation products of MgO, ZrO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , CaO-Al 2 O 3 and MnO-SiO 2 in an Fe-10mass%Ni alloy. In spite of many experiments performed to investigate the formation mechanism and composition control of particles in steel by thermodynamic and kinetic theories 34 36 , limited studies about the effect of melt composition on the nucleation and growth of particles are conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Another difference between the REM modified and unmodified inclu- sions is that the oxysulphides in sample 1 (0 μg/g REM) are in fact complex (multi-phase) inclusions, as is common for steels, 15,16 while the REMs form oxysulphide compounds. 14,17 The REM non-metallic inclusions have high atomic numbers Z, so they appear bright in the backscattered electron images. The type of REM inclusions (oxide/sulphide/oxysulphide) is difficult to determine from the electron microscope images, as they also change little in morphology.…”
Section: Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4, [9][10][11] Alternatively, other elements such as rare-earth metals or zirconium can be used to modify the shape, number and size of the non-metallic inclusions. [12][13][14] In this research we used rare-earth metals (misch metal alloy) with the aim to modify the non-metallic inclusions and thus achieve "clean steel" production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bauschinger effect basically stems from a long-range back stress which resists further against the forward deformation or from a removal of dislocation loop and untangling during the reverse deformation 10 . However, the Bauschinger effect and its mechanisms in linepipe steels are difficult to reveal because of complex microstructures 11 16 . According to Park et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%