2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic determination of the binding constants of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors by a displacement method

Abstract: Somatic angiotensin I-converting enzyme (s-ACE) plays a central role in blood pressure regulation and has been the target of most antihypertensive drugs. A displacement isothermal titration calorimetry method has been used to accurately determine the binding constant of three strong s-ACE inhibitors. Under the experimental conditions studied in this work, the relative potency of the inhibitors was determined to be enalaprilat > lisinopril > captopril. We analyze the thermodynamic behaviour of the binding proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between the ligand and receptor contains two types of binding: specific and non-specific. “Specific binding” represents the “lock–key” interaction with strong affinity, while “non-specific binding” refers to the binding of non-physiological origin with weak affinity. , The values of association constant K a between GF-6 and ACE were 4.67 × 10 5 , 1.63 × 10 4 , and 9.78 × 10 3 M –1 at 15, 20, and 25 °C, respectively, while those reported for captopril, enalaprilat, and lisinopril are 7.5 × 10 7 , 1.9 × 10 8 , and 6.2 × 10 8 M –1 , respectively . These studies showed that all three inhibitors bound with ACE at the active site via “specific binding”, while GF-6 interacted with ACE via “non-specific binding”.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The interaction between the ligand and receptor contains two types of binding: specific and non-specific. “Specific binding” represents the “lock–key” interaction with strong affinity, while “non-specific binding” refers to the binding of non-physiological origin with weak affinity. , The values of association constant K a between GF-6 and ACE were 4.67 × 10 5 , 1.63 × 10 4 , and 9.78 × 10 3 M –1 at 15, 20, and 25 °C, respectively, while those reported for captopril, enalaprilat, and lisinopril are 7.5 × 10 7 , 1.9 × 10 8 , and 6.2 × 10 8 M –1 , respectively . These studies showed that all three inhibitors bound with ACE at the active site via “specific binding”, while GF-6 interacted with ACE via “non-specific binding”.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Upon ligand binding, the changes in the solvent accessible area can be analyzed and related to the measured thermodynamic parameters. Empirical equations can be derived to relate the experimental thermodynamics with structure-based calculated parameters based on analysis of the enzyme's solvent-accessible surface area (Livingstone et al, 1991;Andú jar-Sánchez et al, 2007;Fernando et al, 2007). The thermodynamic parameters were calculated for unligated enzyme and compared with the substrate-bound enzyme using Vadar web server (Volume, Area, Dihedral Angle Reporter), which is a compilation of more than 15 different algorithms and programs for analyzing and assessing peptide and protein structures from their PDB coordinate data (Willard et al, 2003).…”
Section: Dissection Of Ligand-protein Interaction Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of Andújar-Sánchez et al [46], the binding constants of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were determined by a displacement method of ITC. Somatic angiotensin I-converting enzyme (s-ACE) plays a central role in blood pressure regulation and has been the target of most antihypertensive drugs.…”
Section: Rf-1 [X]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative potency of the inhibitors was determined to be enalaprilat>lisinopril>captopril. Andújar-Sánchez et al analyzed the thermodynamic behavior of the binding process using the new structural information provided by the ACE structures, as well as the conformational changes that occurred upon binding [46].…”
Section: Rf-1 [X]mentioning
confidence: 99%