2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00162-018-0468-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic fluctuations in canonical shock–turbulence interaction: effect of shock strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10 (b) shows the fluctuating pressure variance as a function of the streamwise position to highlight the development of the acoustic field. The amplification of the pressure fluctuations across the shock wave is noted, agreeing with Sethuraman et al (2018). The acoustic wave is stronger in the multi-fluid case immediately after the shock wave.…”
Section: Evolution Of Turbulence State Downstream Of the Shocksupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Figure 10 (b) shows the fluctuating pressure variance as a function of the streamwise position to highlight the development of the acoustic field. The amplification of the pressure fluctuations across the shock wave is noted, agreeing with Sethuraman et al (2018). The acoustic wave is stronger in the multi-fluid case immediately after the shock wave.…”
Section: Evolution Of Turbulence State Downstream Of the Shocksupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(2016) and Sethuraman et al. (2018).
Figure 6.Three-dimensional total acoustic energy as a function of the scaled distance .
…”
Section: Detonation-induced Turbulencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…(2016) and Sethuraman et al. (2018) for different types of spectra in canonical shock-turbulence scenarios.…”
Section: Corrections To Rankine–hugoniot Equations and Propagation Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations