2000
DOI: 10.1070/pu2000v043n12abeh000828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic fluctuations within the Gibbs and Einstein approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, a similar study could evaluate the validity of pressure fluctuation relations for canonical systems. 6,8,28…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, a similar study could evaluate the validity of pressure fluctuation relations for canonical systems. 6,8,28…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (24) and (25) are interesting because their integration with respect to their frequency arguments makes it possible to obtain in principle the values of asymmetry and excess of equilibrium electrode-potential fluctuations. In line with this, it deserves mention that in the Gibbs statistical thermodynamics, the equations for thermodynamic fluctuations of intensive values (the electrode potential is an intensive value) involve a non-thermodynamic average value which is sufficiently difficult to find and analyze [19].…”
Section: Asymptotics Of Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on Eqs. (11),(15),(17), and(19), we have the following expression for the bispectrum(24) Taking into account Eqs (13),(15),(18),. and(20) makes it possible to find the following expression for the trispectrum(25) Equations(24) and(25) are the sought relationships.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the fluctuation of an intensive variable such as force cannot be derived from the partition function when the conjugate extensive variable is fixed, i.e. in a fixed-distance ensemble [24,25]. Here, we use the FJC terminally constrained in full space to illustrate this point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%