2018
DOI: 10.4236/gep.2018.611014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Modeling of Uranium (VI) Reductive Immobilization in Groundwater of NPCC Sludge Storages (Novosibirsk, Russia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Pd-based EAH catalysts with high stability, selectivity, and FE, three factors should be considered: (1) the relatively high potential of catalyst oxidation to avoid catalyst dissolution, (2) easy desorption of alkene and difficult formation of PdH x to avoid overhydrogenation, and (3) higher energy barriers for H* self-coupling than H* added to alkyne molecules to suppress competitive HER. We first compare the theoretical potentials of N, S, and P oxidation with alkyne reduction in a pH 14 electrolyte (Figure a). The oxidation potentials of N, S, and P follow the trend of P (−2.6 V vs Hg/HgO) > S (−1.2 V vs Hg/HgO) > N (−0.8 V vs Hg/HgO). Additionally, the vacancy formation energies of Pd 2 N, Pd 2 S, and Pd 2 P anions are calculated to be 1.88, 1.55, and 1.49 eV, respectively (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Pd-based EAH catalysts with high stability, selectivity, and FE, three factors should be considered: (1) the relatively high potential of catalyst oxidation to avoid catalyst dissolution, (2) easy desorption of alkene and difficult formation of PdH x to avoid overhydrogenation, and (3) higher energy barriers for H* self-coupling than H* added to alkyne molecules to suppress competitive HER. We first compare the theoretical potentials of N, S, and P oxidation with alkyne reduction in a pH 14 electrolyte (Figure a). The oxidation potentials of N, S, and P follow the trend of P (−2.6 V vs Hg/HgO) > S (−1.2 V vs Hg/HgO) > N (−0.8 V vs Hg/HgO). Additionally, the vacancy formation energies of Pd 2 N, Pd 2 S, and Pd 2 P anions are calculated to be 1.88, 1.55, and 1.49 eV, respectively (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Oxidation potential of S, P, and N in pH 14 electrolyte. (b) Styrene adsorption energy on Pd and Pd 2 N surfaces. (c) Proposed PdH x inhibition mechanism for Pd–N.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%