Conference Record of the Thirty-First IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2005.1488074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic modelling of luminescent solar concentrators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermodynamic approach (Yablonovitch, 1980;Chatten et al, 2005), based on the detailed balance principle and describing the radiative energy transfer between mesh points in the concentrator plate…”
Section: Computational Methods and Pre-normative Electrical Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermodynamic approach (Yablonovitch, 1980;Chatten et al, 2005), based on the detailed balance principle and describing the radiative energy transfer between mesh points in the concentrator plate…”
Section: Computational Methods and Pre-normative Electrical Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mc-Si cells with improved surface passivation and a concomitant improved blue response the relative short current increase has been calculated to be lower (Van Sark 2006). Modeling large area LSCs has indicated the importance of top-surface losses that occur through the escape cone (Chatten et al 2007) both through primary emission and through emission of luminescence that has been reabsorbed and might otherwise have been trapped via total internal reflection or by mirrors. As an example, for an idealized (perfectly transparent host, LQE = 1), mirrored (perfect mirrors on one short and two long edges, and the bottom surface), 40×5×0.5 cm LSC doped with CdSe/ZnS core-shell QDs with emission matched to a GaInP cell, 24% of the AM1.5G spectrum is absorbed.…”
Section: Modeling Of Spectral Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are two approaches of modeling LSCs, namely thermodynamic modeling [10] and ray-tracing modeling [11]. Thermodynamic modeling is a detailed balance model which is based on the radiative energy transfer between mesh points in the concentrator, whereas ray-tracing modeling is used to track every incoming photon and determine its fate [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermodynamic modeling is a detailed balance model which is based on the radiative energy transfer between mesh points in the concentrator, whereas ray-tracing modeling is used to track every incoming photon and determine its fate [12]. Thermodynamic and tray-tracing models have been used to simulate the performance of LSCs under direct sunlight conditions in order to optimize the performance of LSC with respect to the size of luminescent quantum dots, inclusion of mirrors and multi-layers of the LSC [10][11][12][13][14]. The accuracies of thermodynamic and ray-tracing models are about 4% and 11%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%