1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcht.1996.0074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic properties of pyridine—II. Comparisons of new recommended values with the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1986 Ambrose (24) stated a preference for the (2.5, 5) form over the (3,6) form, particularly for high T r . This preference was based on vapor pressures for ammonia, propane, and butane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In 1986 Ambrose (24) stated a preference for the (2.5, 5) form over the (3,6) form, particularly for high T r . This preference was based on vapor pressures for ammonia, propane, and butane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(3) Uncertainties in the results based on each approach have decreased greatly in the intervening years. Kline and Turkevich (37) in 1944 claimed accuracies of 5 per cent for their statistically derived values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lack of accord indicates an error in one or more of these properties. (5)(6)(7) The purpose of the present paper is to resolve the discrepancy between the independently derived T 0 S o m values for 4-methylpyridine. Early inelastic neutron scattering (i.n.s.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%