2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic simulation of a micro advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage for building application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We introduced a correction factor, ηcorrection, for the oil injection flow. A small deviation from the air flow rate Ṁ induces a significant error in the difference of heat exchanged with the oil ∆ calculated in equation (7). The air mass flow Ṁ depends on the Reynolds number air flow measured with the orifice plate in the diaphragm.…”
Section: Experimental and Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We introduced a correction factor, ηcorrection, for the oil injection flow. A small deviation from the air flow rate Ṁ induces a significant error in the difference of heat exchanged with the oil ∆ calculated in equation (7). The air mass flow Ṁ depends on the Reynolds number air flow measured with the orifice plate in the diaphragm.…”
Section: Experimental and Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CAES power generation facility uses electric motor-driven compressors to inject air into a reservoir, later releasing the compressed air to turn turbines and generate electricity into the grid. Even though CAES concept dates back more than four decades ago [3], environmental concerns and technological advances are encouraging their research and development interest to increase worldwide [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no grid-scale AA-CAES is presently available. Dib et al worked on a system composed of commercial units that are available on the market [14]. By means of simulation, they found a system efficiency of 33.7%, a Levelised Cost Of Energy (LCOE) as low as 0.25 €/kWh and that the storage pressure had the biggest impact on the total cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When such cavities are not available, high pressure vessels are necessary to reduce the storage volume. Dib et al [6] demonstrated that increasing the storage pressure from 40 to 200 bar greatly reduce the initial cost of the system. However, turbines cannot use air at a so high pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%