2013
DOI: 10.2174/09298665113209990051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Stability and Flexibility Characteristics of Antibody Fragment Complexes

Abstract: Free energy landscapes, backbone flexibility and residue-residue couplings for being co-rigid or co-flexible are calculated from the minimal Distance Constraint Model (mDCM) on an exploratory dataset consisting of VL, scFv and Fab antibody fragments. Experimental heat capacity curves are reproduced markedly well, and an analysis of quantitative stability/flexibility relationships (QSFR) is applied to a representative VL domain and several complexes in the scFv and Fab forms. Global flexibility in the denatured… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Watching movies at different time scales gives a sense of the effects of small and large amplitude motions (see Additional file 3 for movies of essential motions of the ScFv protein over different windows). In this case, the movies show the mutation rigidifies nearby residues in corroboration with our previous results [34]. To our knowledge, visualizing combination of modes within user-specified time scale windows offers a unique functionality/tool for researchers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Watching movies at different time scales gives a sense of the effects of small and large amplitude motions (see Additional file 3 for movies of essential motions of the ScFv protein over different windows). In this case, the movies show the mutation rigidifies nearby residues in corroboration with our previous results [34]. To our knowledge, visualizing combination of modes within user-specified time scale windows offers a unique functionality/tool for researchers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The mDCM parameters are u = −1.72 ± 0.26 kcal/mol, v = −0.47 ± 0.19 kcal/mol and δ gp = 1.20 ± 0.04 for the monomer, and u = −1.44 ± 0.27 kcal/mol, v = −0.11 ± 0.20 kcal/mol and δ gp = 1.43 ± 0.23 for the dimer. These parameters indicate that the native state of the dimer has greater conformational entropy per residue than that of the monomer (as seen before packing is not as strong,) while the destabilizing effect of H‐bonding from protein to solvent plays a lesser role. The maximum heat capacity, Cp max , of CXCL7 dimer is more than twice that of the monomers [Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Three empirical parameters that reflect solvent interactions are adjusted to fit to experimental DSC measurements. Since technical details can be found elsewhere 4150 , only the procedure used to generate the results reported here are described.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given an input protein structure at the all-atom level, the mDCM generates an ensemble of constraint topologies characterized by an intensive global flexibility order parameter defined as the number of independent degrees of freedom per residue. After the three empirical parameters are obtained following established protocols 47,50 , the free energy landscape is calculated as a function of temperature and global flexibility order parameter 48 . At temperature, T peak , where heat capacity is a maximum, a thermodynamic average for quantitative stability/flexibility relationships (QSFR) is taken in the native and transition state sub-ensembles, and these QSFR characteristics are compared between RiVax and its mutants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%