“…Notes: 1 Different EOS property methods for supercritical processing were assessed, and PR-BM was selected for the reactor model based on reported higher accuracy; 2 Stoichiometric conversion of glucose model compound was the basis for reactor modelling, under the assumption of complete conversion of organics to syngas (H 2 -CH 4 -CO 2 ) and complete precipitation of inorganics; 3 Fiori et al [35] did not report the EOS used in simulation, however in the groups' earlier work [29], in which the reported conceptual design was based, the authors used the PR-VdW EOS; 4 Examined seven combinations of PR and SRK based EOS with different mixing rules; the authors reported only a 3% variation in the upper limit of H 2 yield predictions; 5 The simulation model used the PSRK EOS while no mixing rule was reported, the Holderbaum-Gemehling mixing rule for supercritical mixtures was reported in the group's earlier work [38]; 6 Equilibrium conditions for SCWG were based on previous experimental results with a ruthenium catalyst, however the modelling approach was not specifically reported; 7 Algal conversion and yield data for the model were based on experimental findings reported in one of the publications [43]. It is accepted that through the fine-tuning of the reactive conditions and subsequent unit configurations, the SCWG process could be either designed for BioSNG production under catalytic, low temperature and higher solid content conditions [21,36,40,[42][43][44] or for hydrogen under high temperature, lower solid content and longer residence times [15,20,25,27,34,35,[37][38][39]45]. Another critical design question, aside from maximizing conversion to the desired product within the reactor system, is the development of a thermal recovery system to minimize the higher thermodynamic quality heat and power demand of the core conversion step taking place under supercritical conditions.…”