1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0033583500003772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics and membrane processes

Abstract: This review represents a personal view of membrane thermodynamics. I do not intend to deal at all with the irreversible thermodynamics of membrane mass transfer processes. This aspect has been covered far more competently and completely by other people (Bittar, 1970; Paterson, 1970; Rottenberg, Caplan & Essig, 1970; Mitchell, 1970; Rothschild et al. 1980; Oster, Perelson & Katchalsky, 1973; Kedem & Katchalsky, 1958; Schwartz, 1971). The recent review on osmosis by Hill (1979) is a particularly succ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 257 publications
(263 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is supported by the lack of a significant shift in the transition temperature determined by the intersect of two lines fitted to a decreasing number of data points (Fig. 3) and by the thermodynamic properties obtained when data are analyzed as a curvilinear function based on the equation described by Klein (10). When this equation is used it is possible to determine the transition midpoint (Tm), the transition width (Tw), the partition ratio (P) for label in the fluid and solid phases, as well as the enthalpy and entropy for motion where X is the jump frequency; R, the universal gas constant (8.34 J°K7'); k, the rate constant; AHf, AHl, ASf, and AS, the enthalpy and entropy in the fluid and solid phases, respectively; Tm the transition midpoint ('K); Tw the width at half-height of the transition (°K); P the ratio of the label in the fluid and solid phases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is supported by the lack of a significant shift in the transition temperature determined by the intersect of two lines fitted to a decreasing number of data points (Fig. 3) and by the thermodynamic properties obtained when data are analyzed as a curvilinear function based on the equation described by Klein (10). When this equation is used it is possible to determine the transition midpoint (Tm), the transition width (Tw), the partition ratio (P) for label in the fluid and solid phases, as well as the enthalpy and entropy for motion where X is the jump frequency; R, the universal gas constant (8.34 J°K7'); k, the rate constant; AHf, AHl, ASf, and AS, the enthalpy and entropy in the fluid and solid phases, respectively; Tm the transition midpoint ('K); Tw the width at half-height of the transition (°K); P the ratio of the label in the fluid and solid phases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…1) that a thermotropic transition occurs in plant polar lipids the application of this model, in preference to other models described by Klein (10), seemed appropriate. Klein (10) has shown that the distribution of the Arrhenius plot in relation to the transition temperature is determined by P. We have therefore determined a value ofP for a nitroxide spin label in relatively defined systems, (18) consisting of either pure DPPC or mixtures of DPPC and polar lipids from wheat roots. As shown in Table I, the value obtained for P using DPPC is 0.2 and the distribution of the Arrhenius plot, shown in Figure 4A is consistent with a melting transition at 41C and a transition width of 2 C deg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-state transition model rests on the assumption that the initial and final states have measurably different thermodynamic properties (22). To unambiguously characterize these states via infrared spectroscopy, they must also have measurably different spectral characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1973) around the equilibrium. In a rate process the controlling unit is a stable nucleus (which reaches the point of no return and transits into the other phase) (Klein, 1982). It is not obvious what determines the size of the nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%