2011
DOI: 10.4155/fmc.11.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics-Based Drug Design: Strategies for Inhibiting Protein–Protein Interactions

Abstract: The inhibition of protein–protein interactions and their ensuing signaling processes play an increasingly important role in modern medicine. Small molecular-weight inhibitors that can be administered orally are the preferred approach but efficient strategies for developing them are not yet generally available. Due to the large size difference between the protein–protein interface and the small molecule, inhibitor interactions are expected to extend to only a small region of the interface. If this is the case, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Triclabendazole’s relative potency, which bears future investigation, is therefore consistent with the notion that non-competitive inhibitors that alter conformationally active regions of proteins should be more potent. 32 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 Triclabendazole’s relative potency, which bears future investigation, is therefore consistent with the notion that non-competitive inhibitors that alter conformationally active regions of proteins should be more potent. 32 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, small-molecule inhibitors that do not directly compete with protein-protein interactions may be the most effective for the simple fact that they are unencumbered by competition. 3234 In the specific case of triclabendazole, we can safely assume that the binding of the small molecule is to either the ECD or TM domain of TNFR1, because the intracellular domains in our FRET constructs are replaced with fluorescent tags, which were shown to have no interaction with the small-molecule compounds (Figure S1B). Therefore, triclabendazole may act allosterically to disrupt receptor oligomerization; or, based on more recent discussions of small-molecule strategies for targeting receptor-receptor interactions, 32,34 it may bind to conformationally active sites of the receptor and disrupt the propagation of the downstream signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the protein-protein interface is fairly large (~700–4000 Å 2 ), and the size differences make it impossible for small molecules to completely block the protein-protein interactions like the traditional agonists/antagonists. Within the protein-protein interface, smaller regions, or “hotspots”, are responsible for a disproportionate contribution to the binding energy of the two interacting proteins and are targets for theraputics 4445 . Our structure data show that the binding pocket for PHU and 1-EBIO includes L480 (Figs.…”
Section: Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy implies improving binding affinity ( ΔG ), while simultaneously minimizing the unfavorable binding entropy. 23 The optimization strategy essentially combines standard SAR with thermodynamic analysis by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC). Importantly, thermodynamic-guided alanine scanning mutagenesis has recently demonstrated that gp120 residue contributions to allosteric structuring are not proportional to binding affinity, providing a structural foundation to the finding that not all NBD-like compounds elicit the unwanted allosteric structuring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%