Thermodynamics - Kinetics of Dynamic Systems 2011
DOI: 10.5772/22833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics, Kinetics and Adsorption Properties of Some Biomolecules onto Mineral Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the zeta potential of PVDF/nylon-6,6/chitosan membrane surface is least negative than that of the pure PVDF and PVDF/nylon-6,6 membranes, owing to the increase in the density of amine functional groups from nylon-6,6/chitosan nanofibers. The isoelectric point (IEP) of the PVDF/nylon-6,6/chitosan membrane was detected at pH 5.3, where there are equal number of oppositely charged groups resulting in neutral charge surface exhibiting zwitterionic characteristics and the ability to resist membrane–protein interactions. , Although the PVDF/nylon-6,6/chitosan membrane was slightly negatively charged (−18 mV) at the operating pH of 6.7 (pH of BSA solution) of current filtration testing, it has greater potential for protein fouling resistance, as compared to the benchmark membranes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the zeta potential of PVDF/nylon-6,6/chitosan membrane surface is least negative than that of the pure PVDF and PVDF/nylon-6,6 membranes, owing to the increase in the density of amine functional groups from nylon-6,6/chitosan nanofibers. The isoelectric point (IEP) of the PVDF/nylon-6,6/chitosan membrane was detected at pH 5.3, where there are equal number of oppositely charged groups resulting in neutral charge surface exhibiting zwitterionic characteristics and the ability to resist membrane–protein interactions. , Although the PVDF/nylon-6,6/chitosan membrane was slightly negatively charged (−18 mV) at the operating pH of 6.7 (pH of BSA solution) of current filtration testing, it has greater potential for protein fouling resistance, as compared to the benchmark membranes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%