connecting the active electrode material and the electrolyte, (3) the charge transfer reaction between the liquid electrolyte and the active electrode material, and (4) the solid state transport and phase nucleation/ transformation kinetics within the active electrode material.Many processes have been reported to improve Li-ion battery (dis)charge kinetics each improving one or more of the described aspects 1-4 illustrating the complexity and the lack of agreement concerning the rate-limiting step. This is best illustrated by LiFePO 4 , an important electrode material proposed by Padhi et al. [ 3 ] in 1997, and an intensively studied, well-established model system up to date. (a) For LiFePO 4 the initial hurdle of poor intrinsic electronic and solid-state ionic conduction were overcome by reducing the particle size in combination with carbon or metallic conducting coatings. [4][5][6] In addition to the trivial decrease in the solid-state diffusion distance, particle size reduction toward the nano range has also shown to impact the kinetic and thermodynamic properties of electrode materials. [7][8][9][10] For instance, the nucleation barrier for the fi rst-order phase transition in LiFePO 4 is predicted to be smaller for smaller particles. [ 11 ] Also, the equilibrium potential depends on the particle size, which is predicted to be the consequence of the surface energy which has more impact in smaller particles. [ 7,[12][13][14] In LiFePO 4 this results in a larger equilibrium voltage in smaller LiFePO 4 particles [ 12,15 ] which explains the spontaneous, without an externally applied potential, Li-ion transport from small to large LiFePO 4 particles. [ 16 ] (b) First-order phase transitions are generally thought to result in poor kinetics as compared to solid solution reactions. The observation that the fi rst-order phase transition can be bypassed in LiFePO 4 at high (dis)charge rates [ 17,18 ] driven by the overpotential, [19][20][21] is also considered to be responsible for the high (dis)charge rates that can be achieved. [17][18][19][20][21] (c) Surface diffusion on the LiFePO 4 particles appears to play a role as very fast (dis)charge rates were achieved by the addition of an ionic-conducting phase at the LiFePO 4 surface.[ 22 ] (d) In many studies it has been recognized that for higher rates the ionic transport through the porous electrode structure is rate limiting. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] This is consistent with the direct observation that the electrode capacity decreases with increasing thickness at the same rate and loading density. [ 23,30 ] Over the years, various modelling approaches have been describing the complex phenomena that play a role, mainly focussing on the with the ion transport and charge transfer through the porous electrode matrix, [ 1,31 ] solid solutions and distributed ohmic drop in the One of the key challenges of Li-ion electrodes is enhancement of (dis)charge rates. This is severely hindered by the absence of a technique that allows direct and nondestructive observation of li...