“…[22,23] Such measurements may prove effective in an educational setting (vide infra), so we investigated whether the effect can be replicated at a lower field strength by acquiring spectra of a series of samples of various concentrations at 1.4 T. Figure 4a illustrates a plot of the chemical shifts of Pb(NO 3 ) 2 as a function of the concentration of this sample dissolved in H 2 O. The observed trend is comparable with that reported by Harrison et al, [19] although at lower concentrations, our values suggest greater shielding, such that our predicted shielding at infinite dilution, −2,885 ppm, is significantly greater than that predicted by Harrison et al [19] In contrast, Dybowski et al [23] reported greater shielding values at lower concentrations than we observed. Previously, Lutz and Stricker reported a 72-ppm difference between the chemical shifts for 1.0 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 and that expected for the sample at infinite dilution [24] ; this compares with a range of 79 ppm observed here and 108 ppm reported by Harrison et al [19] Neue et al have discussed factors, such as the temperature and concentration dependence of 207 Pb chemical shifts, that explain many such discrepancies.…”