1992
DOI: 10.1021/j100200a047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of micellization at charged interphases within the framework of the phase-separation model

Abstract: 8453that give rise to the model, are not predicted to be especially important in the overall energy transfer (in the same way that individual solvent molecule/particle collisions in macroscopic Brownian motion do not contribute much to the overall diffusive motion): indeed, in the most primitive version of the model, the average energy transfer is Seen to be completely independent of the highest-frequency modes of the substrate.1° ConclusionsTrajectory calculations and the BRW model agree with experiments on r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, although the width of the capacitance pit increases with increasing concentration at negative potentials, as expected for a compact layer, the opposite trend is observed at the positive end of the capacitance pit (a trend confirmed for all concentrations studied in the 1 × 10 -5 to 1 × 10 -4 M range). As described in refs and , the transformation of an adsorbed layer which consists of close-packed patches of associated adsorbate molecules (surface aggregates or micelles) rather than a continuous single-entity layer is expected to give rise to bell-shaped peaks of finite height as the ones shown in Figure . At a molecular level, one could speculate that the oleate molecules have a vertical orientation with the hydrocarbon tails in contact with the mercury surface and their charged carboxylate tail in contact with the aqueous solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, although the width of the capacitance pit increases with increasing concentration at negative potentials, as expected for a compact layer, the opposite trend is observed at the positive end of the capacitance pit (a trend confirmed for all concentrations studied in the 1 × 10 -5 to 1 × 10 -4 M range). As described in refs and , the transformation of an adsorbed layer which consists of close-packed patches of associated adsorbate molecules (surface aggregates or micelles) rather than a continuous single-entity layer is expected to give rise to bell-shaped peaks of finite height as the ones shown in Figure . At a molecular level, one could speculate that the oleate molecules have a vertical orientation with the hydrocarbon tails in contact with the mercury surface and their charged carboxylate tail in contact with the aqueous solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The variation of the C vs E curves with time is even more pronounced at extreme polarizations where the shape, height, and position of the capacitance peaks are seen to be critically dependent on time. This suggests once again that if the characteristics of these peaks are to be correlated to the oleate bulk cmc according to the empirical criteria developed by Volldhart, Dörfler, and Müller or interpreted according to the theory of phase transitions involving surface aggregates developed by Nikitas 24 and Nikitas et al, then only the long-time curves can safely be considered as near-equilibrium ones. This makes the use of a dropping mercury electrode (DME) whose mercury drop lifetime rarely exceeds 10 s and is usually never longer than 5 s, completely inadequate for the study of slowly proceeding adsorption/phase transition phenomena.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 For disaccharidic compounds, a split of the capacity peak is observed at c \ 1 ] 10~3 M for MALTACO8 and c \ 5 ] 10~4 M for MALTACS8. As proposed by Nikitas et al,30,31 this splitting, which appears above the CMC, is related to the formation of multilayers of micelles on the electrode surface. According to our previous observations with non-reducible disaccharidic surfactants,20 these concentrations should approach the value of the CMC of MALTACO8 and MALTACS8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Also, chronoamperometric measurements had not provided any evidence of nucleation processes [22]. Such behavior is usually associated with the transformation of an adsorbed layer that consists of close-packed patches of associated adsorbate molecules, rather than continuos single entity layer [23,24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%