2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4862535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of photon-enhanced thermionic emission solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A thermodynamic analysis of PETE converters was presented [10], where it was shown that the upper efficiency limit of a PETE device converges to the efficiency of solar thermal converters. However, that work did not consider the possibility of an IR coupling element that can absorb sub-bandgap photons and utilize their energy to further increase the cathode temperature and the conversion efficiency.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thermodynamic analysis of PETE converters was presented [10], where it was shown that the upper efficiency limit of a PETE device converges to the efficiency of solar thermal converters. However, that work did not consider the possibility of an IR coupling element that can absorb sub-bandgap photons and utilize their energy to further increase the cathode temperature and the conversion efficiency.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• modelowanie i optymalizacja procesu PETE [7,8,9,10,11], • dobór materiałów elektrod konwertera [12,13.14,15], • poszukiwanie metod ograniczenia wpływu ładunku przestrzennego na pracę konwertera [16,17,18,19]. Tabela 1.…”
Section: Fotonowo Wzmocniona Termoemisja Elektronowaunclassified
“…A different approach is to optimize the efficiency of a PETE-CC by minimization of entropy generation [28]. The best efficiency prediction at 1000 suns is 58%, and 60.8% in a CC configuration with an ideal secondary heat engine.…”
Section: The Efficiency Limits Of a Pete Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unusual solution may be a result of not using an IR absorber in the cathode, forcing the bandgap to a low value in order to absorb most of the solar spectrum, and then compensating with a high electron affinity (to obtain useful voltage) and high temperature (to overcome the high affinity). Additional solutions presented in [28] show a bandgap about 1 eV and non-zero chemical potential (indicating photonic enhancement) of 0.28 eV, but they offer efficiency below 45%, even though they require a cathode temperature above 1450 K. Possibly a more practical solution is also shown with a cathode temperature of 573 K, a bandgap of 0.82 eV, and an efficiency of 37.9% (44% with an ideal secondary heat engine), which is impressive for this low temperature. It is interesting to note that these solutions tend to recommend lower optimal bandgaps compared to other analyses (e.g.…”
Section: The Efficiency Limits Of a Pete Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%