2013
DOI: 10.1021/je400388j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of Solution of Hemato- and Deuteroporphyrins in N,N-Dimethylformamide

Abstract: This paper focuses on the results of the first accurate study of thermodynamics of solution for two blood porphyrins in the model of a protein-like environment–liquid N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) in the physiological temperature range. The solubility of hematoporphyrin dimethylether dimethylester (HDEDE) and deuteroporphyrin dimethylester (DDE) in DMF has been obtained from (288 to 318) K. Free energies, enthalpies, entropies, and heat capacities of solution have been computed from solubility data and compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations (1) and (2) indicate that dissolution of both porphyrins is accompanied by the unfavorable enthalpy change. This unfavorable enthalpy is found to be strongly temperature dependent, which is very similar to the behavior of deuteroporphyrin [5]. Heat capacities of solution for PDE and MDE are nearly identical H(17-1)), À4.14 (br.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Equations (1) and (2) indicate that dissolution of both porphyrins is accompanied by the unfavorable enthalpy change. This unfavorable enthalpy is found to be strongly temperature dependent, which is very similar to the behavior of deuteroporphyrin [5]. Heat capacities of solution for PDE and MDE are nearly identical H(17-1)), À4.14 (br.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The agreement between experimental and computed by equation (3) quantities is rather well. For most soluble DDE and HDEDE [5] the agreement is slightly better that may be explained both by some underestimation of solubility values at the reference temperature and a stronger tendency of PDE and MDE to associate in DMF. The latter may lead to the deviation of activity coefficients from the unity (see figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To better understand the dissolution process of TPP and TPPMnCl in ethanol + water solvent mixtures, the thermodynamic parameters of solution such as dissolution enthalpy Δ sol H 0 (J·mol –1 ), dissolution entropy Δ sol S 0 (J·mol –1 ·K –1 ), Gibbs free energy Δ sol G 0 (kJ·mol –1 ), and isobaric heat capacity Δ sol C p 0 (J·mol –1 ·K –1 ) should be derived from the experimentally determined solubilities by using the Clark–Glew equation ,, and assuming that the values of Δ sol C p 0 are temperature-independent for the temperature range studied. , The Clark–Glew equation is written as where x is the mole fraction of solute, R is the gas constant, θ is the reference temperature, T is the experiment temperature, and Δ sol H θ 0 , Δ sol G θ 0 , and Δ sol C pθ 0 are the dissolution enthalpy, Gibbs free energy, and isobaric heat capacity at reference temperature, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%