We have undertaken atomistic molecular simulations to systematically determine the structural contributions to the hydrophobicity of fluorinated solutes and surfaces compared to the corresponding hydrocarbon, yielding a unified explanation for these phenomena. We have transformed a short chain alkane, n-octane, to n-perfluorooctane in stages. The free-energy changes and the entropic components calculated for each transformation stage yield considerable insight into the relevant physics. To evaluate the effect of a surface, we have also conducted contact-angle simulations of water on self-assembled monolayers of hydrocarbon and fluorocarbon thiols. Our results, which are consistent with experimental observations, indicate that the hydrophobicity of the fluorocarbon, whether the interaction with water is as solute or as surface, is due to its "fatness." In solution, the extra work of cavity formation to accommodate a fluorocarbon, compared to a hydrocarbon, is not offset by enhanced energetic interactions with water. The enhanced hydrophobicity of fluorinated surfaces arises because fluorocarbons pack less densely on surfaces leading to poorer van der Waals interactions with water. We find that interaction of water with a hydrophobic solute/surface is primarily a function of van der Waals interactions and is substantially independent of electrostatic interactions. This independence is primarily due to the strong tendency of water at room temperature to maintain its hydrogen bonding network structure at an interface lacking hydrophilic sites.solubility | hydration | wetting P erfluorinated alkanes which have all the hydrogen (H) atoms of an alkane replaced with fluorine (F) atoms are known to have much lower water solubilities than the corresponding hydrocarbons (1, 2) while at the same time showing high lipophobicity (2) and an extraordinary affinity for carbon dioxide (3, 4). Enzyme inhibitors with fluorinated moieties show stronger binding than their nonfluorinated analogues (5), even in cases when the group on the inhibitor is not among those that bind to the active site (6)-consistent with the expectation from higher hydrophobicity. One intriguing observation regarding the greater hydrophobicity is that the free energy of hydration per unit hydrophobic surface area is similar for hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons (6). The puzzling aspect of this similarity is that, because the C-F bond has a much greater dipole moment than does the C-H bond, a stronger binding with dipolar water might be expected. Further, although the polarizability of F in the C-F bond is relatively low considering its position in the periodic table, it is not lower than that in the C-H bond (7), so that the dispersion interactions of C-F with water are reasonably expected to be more attractive than those of C-H with water. Therefore, a fluorocarbon surface could be argued to be more hydrophilic than that of the corresponding hydrocarbon. A plausible resolution could be that the fluorocarbon with a molecular cross-section of 28.3 Å 2 (8) occupi...