2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.035109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of the two-dimensional Falicov-Kimball model: A classical Monte Carlo study

Abstract: The two-dimensional Falicov-Kimball (FK) model is analyzed using Monte Carlo method. In the case of concentrations of both itinerant and localized particles equal to 0.5 we determine temperature dependence of specific heat, charge density wave susceptibility and density-density correlation function. In the weak interaction regime we find a first order transition to the ordered state and anomalous temperature dependence of the correlation function. We construct the phase diagram of half-filled FK model. Also, t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
53
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
11
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we notice that for not too small values of the parameters U or J, some our results are consistent with a few available data obtained, either exactly in the thermodynamic limit ͑as for example energies per site of the antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic phase 18 ͒ or by the Monte Carlo method for larger systems. 15 Indeed, the results we obtained for the charge order in the case of J = 0 are very similar to the results reported for the spinless FKM. 15 However, since in our case the number of itinerant electrons is doubled ͑as compare to the spinless case͒ the effective forces between localized particles and transformation temperatures are two times higher than in the spinless system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, we notice that for not too small values of the parameters U or J, some our results are consistent with a few available data obtained, either exactly in the thermodynamic limit ͑as for example energies per site of the antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic phase 18 ͒ or by the Monte Carlo method for larger systems. 15 Indeed, the results we obtained for the charge order in the case of J = 0 are very similar to the results reported for the spinless FKM. 15 However, since in our case the number of itinerant electrons is doubled ͑as compare to the spinless case͒ the effective forces between localized particles and transformation temperatures are two times higher than in the spinless system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…15 Indeed, the results we obtained for the charge order in the case of J = 0 are very similar to the results reported for the spinless FKM. 15 However, since in our case the number of itinerant electrons is doubled ͑as compare to the spinless case͒ the effective forces between localized particles and transformation temperatures are two times higher than in the spinless system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model is solved by means of a variation of the Monte Carlo (MC) method. The method is based on the classical METROPOLIS algorithm modified in such a way that systems with both quantum and classical degrees of freedom can be simulated [16]. In each MC step, a new configuration of the heavy atoms is generated.…”
Section: The Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a conguration in a bulk system would correspond to a superposition of two equivalent chessboard states, where fermions occupy one sublattice and bosons the other one [22,23].…”
Section: The Fermion-boson Model On a Dimermentioning
confidence: 99%