2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelastic stress in concentrating solar receiver tubes: A retrospect on stress analysis methodology, and comparison of salt and sodium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of code verification, the results presented by Logie (Logie et al, 2018) will be used, the parameters used are listed in Tab 1. For comparison and analysis purposes, the Von Mises equivalent stress is calculated, according to the failure theory, this equivalent stress must be less than the yield stress to ensure that the material remains in the zone of elasticity and plastic deformation failures do not occur.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purposes of code verification, the results presented by Logie (Logie et al, 2018) will be used, the parameters used are listed in Tab 1. For comparison and analysis purposes, the Von Mises equivalent stress is calculated, according to the failure theory, this equivalent stress must be less than the yield stress to ensure that the material remains in the zone of elasticity and plastic deformation failures do not occur.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal stress may have cyclical behavior due to the passage of clouds or the weather conditions of the place; these transient changes may cause temperature rise to the average melting temperature inducing the flow of the material. The permanent presence of creep and fatigue produces plastic deformations to the metal, which in the long term, causes the failure and the decrease of the lifespan of the receiver (Rodriguez-Sanchez et al, 2014) In this context, there are authors who relate the thermal stresses in sodium-operated solar receivers (Conroy et al, 2018a;Conroy et al, 2018b;Logie et al, 2018;Cagnioli et al, 2019;Boerema et al, 2013), in these research, it can be concluded how the thermal stress decreases compared to a receiver operated with molten salts, given the high thermal conductivity and heat transfer rate of liquid sodium. Of these authors, only Boerema includes the change of dimensions and arrangement of the tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the radial and circumferential temperature distribution are solved using the Gauss-Seidel iterative scheme before coefficients for the harmonic solution are sought using a least-squares fit to the inner and outer tube surface temperatures. The classical method was implemented in a Python script and validated using a solid mechanics solver from the OpenFOAM(R) toolbox 16 .…”
Section: Thermo-elastic Stress Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fritsch [ 16 ] increased the mean heat flux density by 200% and peak heat flux by 280% compared with molten salt receiver limits. William R. studied a solar receiver made from stainless steel 316 with liquid sodium as a heat transfer fluid, the thermoelastic stress was 35% lower compared with the receiver working with molten salt [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%