2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelectric module design strategy for solid-state refrigeration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimations of the optimal L Ã and the peak cooling power density by Equations ( 21) and ( 22) are validated over a broad range of the heat transfer coefficients from 5 to 5000 W m À2 K À1 , which is able to cover various scenarios, including natural air convection, forced convection, and even liquid-vapor phase change heat transfer. As indicated in Figure 5A,B, the optimal L Ã is in general evaluated within ±15%, while the peak cooling power density calculated by substituting Equation (22) into Equation (21) shows negligible error all over the whole heat transfer and temperature difference range. The fact that a rough estimation of the optimal L Ã still leads to an excellent estimation of the peak cooling power density is illustrated in detail in SI (Dependence of cooling power density on L*).…”
Section: Maximization Of Cooling Power Under Given H H H C and δTmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimations of the optimal L Ã and the peak cooling power density by Equations ( 21) and ( 22) are validated over a broad range of the heat transfer coefficients from 5 to 5000 W m À2 K À1 , which is able to cover various scenarios, including natural air convection, forced convection, and even liquid-vapor phase change heat transfer. As indicated in Figure 5A,B, the optimal L Ã is in general evaluated within ±15%, while the peak cooling power density calculated by substituting Equation (22) into Equation (21) shows negligible error all over the whole heat transfer and temperature difference range. The fact that a rough estimation of the optimal L Ã still leads to an excellent estimation of the peak cooling power density is illustrated in detail in SI (Dependence of cooling power density on L*).…”
Section: Maximization Of Cooling Power Under Given H H H C and δTmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The fact that a rough estimation of the optimal L Ã still leads to an excellent estimation of the peak cooling power density is illustrated in detail in SI (Dependence of cooling power density on L*). Equation (22) suggests that the optimal L Ã decreases with h h but increases with the ratio h h =h c , so it could rise to tens of centimeters under very low h h and h c (see Figure 5A). As a reference, we present in Figure 5C the scope of L Ã for the commercially available TEC modules, 55 as well as the relationship between the maximum cooling power density (ΔT ¼ 0) and L Ã over more than 370 types of products.…”
Section: Maximization Of Cooling Power Under Given H H H C and δTmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further still, to make TEGs viable as energy recovery engines many of these legs must be connected in an optimal manner to maximise heat to electrical power conversion. [28][29][30][31] It's important to realize there are more considerations in the design of such systems like, the optimal leg length, geometry, number of legs, stability of the thermal paste applied in the synthesis of modules, as well as how many modules form a functional TEG unit etc. The p-type material has holes as the majority charge carrier meanwhile electrons are the majority charge carriers within n-type materials.…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] This is known as the Peltier effect and can be used in cooling applications such as central processing unit (CPU) heat management, refrigerators, dehumidifiers, and cooling heat flux systems. 28,[37][38][39][40][41] However for this technology to replace more established power generators it would require higher efficiencies. The efficiency is denoted by a dimensionless figure of merit (ZT).…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%