2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr08878k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelectric properties of oligoglycine molecular wires

Abstract: We have investigated the electrical and thermoelectrical properties of glycine chains with and without cysteine terminal groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the problem of increasing the thermoelectric performance of organic molecules, Finch et al 10 demonstrated theoretically that large values of the Seebeck coefficient could be obtained by creating transport resonances and anti-resonances within the HOMO-LUMO gap and tuning their energetic location relative to the Fermi energy. Following these pioneering works, several experimental [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and theoretical studies [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] have attempted to probe and improve the thermoelectric performance of single molecules. However, progress has been hampered by the additional complexity of thermoelectric measurement set-ups, because unlike measurements of single-molecule conductance, Seebeck measurements require additional control and determination of temperature gradients at a molecular scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the problem of increasing the thermoelectric performance of organic molecules, Finch et al 10 demonstrated theoretically that large values of the Seebeck coefficient could be obtained by creating transport resonances and anti-resonances within the HOMO-LUMO gap and tuning their energetic location relative to the Fermi energy. Following these pioneering works, several experimental [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and theoretical studies [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] have attempted to probe and improve the thermoelectric performance of single molecules. However, progress has been hampered by the additional complexity of thermoelectric measurement set-ups, because unlike measurements of single-molecule conductance, Seebeck measurements require additional control and determination of temperature gradients at a molecular scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sharp contrast, Venkataraman and co-workers reported much higher β values of 0.97 and 0.93 Å −1 in break junctions with oligoglycine and oligoglyalanine, respectively; 33 Lambert and co-workers reported high β values of 1.57 and 1.22 Å −1 for single molecules of oligoglycine with one or two Cys anchoring groups, respectively. 34 Off-resonant coherent tunneling was concluded to be the dominant charge transport mechanism in these break junctions; however, the molecules are forcefully stretched and therefore such experiments do not represent conduction across the molecules in their natural conformational state. Frisbie and co-workers found that substitution of the −CH 2 − units in alkanedithiol-based molecular junctions with −O− using conductive nanoprobes as top contacts increased the resistance of the junction but with small changes , respectively.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZT can be thus considerably high only when κphκel. [ 45 ] Here we find that κph>κel for σ‐saturated HDT junctions that are coupled to Au(100)NW, Au(5,3)NT and Au(7,3)NW, while κphκel for π‐conjugated BDT based SMJs (see Figure 5c–f). In SMJs, the molecular states near the Fermi level influence the transmission function while the phonon vibrations can contribute to the thermal conductance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In order to obtain the phononic part of the thermal conductance (κph), the concept of dynamical matrix was exploited to compute the transmission probability of phonons, τphfalse(ωfalse), as implemented in the Gollum tool [ 43–45 ] so that κph=12π0dωωτphfalse(ωfalse)fBE(ω,T)Twith τphfalse(ωfalse)=Trfalse[GCr(ω)ΓL(ω)GCa(ω)ΓR(ω)false], and fBE=false[exp(ωkBT)1false]1 being the Bose–Einstein distribution function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%