2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermogravimetric assessment of combustion characteristics of blends of a coal with different biomass chars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a later study, also using thermogravimetric techniques, Haykiri and Yaman [2009] determined that the higher or lower burnout obtained when mixing lignites with two different types of biomass, was heavily dependent on the type of biomass in the blend. Finally, Sahu et al [2010] corroborated earlier hypotheses regarding the importance of the different levels of reactivity of the blend components. In effect, these authors determined that mixing chars of biomass (highly reactive) with coal (less reactive) would not necessarily result in better burns (increased burnout).…”
Section: Introduction 12supporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a later study, also using thermogravimetric techniques, Haykiri and Yaman [2009] determined that the higher or lower burnout obtained when mixing lignites with two different types of biomass, was heavily dependent on the type of biomass in the blend. Finally, Sahu et al [2010] corroborated earlier hypotheses regarding the importance of the different levels of reactivity of the blend components. In effect, these authors determined that mixing chars of biomass (highly reactive) with coal (less reactive) would not necessarily result in better burns (increased burnout).…”
Section: Introduction 12supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The characteristics of low calorific and limitations of the prior art combustion value fuel, which limit its large-scale use [7], but mixed combustion is an effective way to improve their combustion and combustion efficiency [8][9][10]. The mechanism of low calorific value of blended coal combustion was understood by the study of lignite coals and coal gangue mixed combustion dynamics, which can effectively guide the combustion process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43) The combustion reaction activation energy of coke breeze and charcoal were 122.75 kJ·mol − 1 and 55.54 kJ·mol − 1 respectively as shown in Table 4. Hence, the activation energy of charcoal is much lower than that of coke breeze in the combustion zone, indicating that the combustion reaction of charcoal is much easier to carry out, as it has been reported by Sahu et al 24) From Table 4, it could also find that when the charcoal was modified by 3% B 2 O 3 and 2% SiO 2 , the activation energy of combustion reaction was increased from 55.54 kJ·mol − 1 to 92.82 kJ·mol − 1 and 86.97 kJ·mol − 1 respectively, which indicated a significant improvement compared with non-modified case. Therefore, the activation energy of charcoal showed a closer value to coke breeze, which demonstrated that the combustion reaction of modified fuel needed more calories to trigger, thereby inhibiting the combustion reaction.…”
Section: Influences On Combustion Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 72%