2020
DOI: 10.1177/0734242x19896624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermogravimetric studies on co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied biomass and coal blends

Abstract: The pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis behaviours of cotton stalk (CS), torrefied cotton stalk (TCS) and mined coal, as single fuels, and their blends, have been examined through thermogravimetric analysis. Biomass has been torrefied at 250°C for 45 min to enhance physicochemical properties, and then mixed with mined coal for co-pyrolysis. Thermal degradation of CS and TCS is characterized by a reaction. However, this is not the case for mined coal, which shows a single-stage reaction. The thermal degradation of all b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is easier for the biomass to decompose when subjected to heating (Quan & Gao, 2016). Similar findings have also been reported by Vuthaluru (2004) on pyrolysis of wood waste and wheat straw, He et al (2018) on co-pyrolysis of bituminous coal and fermented cornstalk, and (Panwar et al, 2020) on co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied biomass and coal blends, and (Quan et al, 2014) on white pine and bituminous coal using thermogravimetric analysis. The synergistic interaction between the SC and EFB can be observed from the additive or non-additive behavior based on the sum of weighted average of the mass loss profile, as indicated in Eq.…”
Section: Effect Of Blending In Inert Conditionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is easier for the biomass to decompose when subjected to heating (Quan & Gao, 2016). Similar findings have also been reported by Vuthaluru (2004) on pyrolysis of wood waste and wheat straw, He et al (2018) on co-pyrolysis of bituminous coal and fermented cornstalk, and (Panwar et al, 2020) on co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied biomass and coal blends, and (Quan et al, 2014) on white pine and bituminous coal using thermogravimetric analysis. The synergistic interaction between the SC and EFB can be observed from the additive or non-additive behavior based on the sum of weighted average of the mass loss profile, as indicated in Eq.…”
Section: Effect Of Blending In Inert Conditionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As can be seen, both samples followed the same thermal evolution profile as their parent fuel. Maximum rate of devolatilization (also known as peak height) gradually increases with an increasing amount of biomass in the blends due to high volatile quantities released (Idris et al, 2010;Vamvuka et al, 2003;Panwar et al, 2020)). This also shows improved reactivity of the sample where biomass increment will increase the maximum rate of mass loss (Jayaraman et al, 2017).…”
Section: Effect Of Blending In Inert Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DTG peak of RM, RM-200, and RM-250 was observed at 320 °C (-0.49 %/°C), 319°C (-0.50 %/°C), and 332°C (-0.42 %/°C), respectively. However, the DTG peak associated with the decomposition of hemicellulose did not appear in the RM-300 sample torrefied at 300 °C [60].…”
Section: Thermogrevimeric Analysis Of Raw and Torrefied Mustard Strawmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Table3represents the emission patterns expected from the combustion of solid biomass fuels such as mustard straw, cotton stalks, sugarcane bagasse, and hard coal based on their elemental composition[27,50,60,72].It is observed that, CO and CO2 emissions from the combustion of RM residues (50.22 g/kg and 1229.89 g/kg,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panwar et al, [12] describe pyrolysis as a one-step global reaction, hence n = 1, so model the pyrolysis kinetic equation as Eq. 6 from Eq.…”
Section: Kinetics Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%