2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005gl023655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermohaline circulation hysteresis: A model intercomparison

Abstract: [1] We present results from an intercomparison of 11 different climate models of intermediate complexity, in which the North Atlantic Ocean was subjected to slowly varying changes in freshwater input. All models show a characteristic hysteresis response of the thermohaline circulation to the freshwater forcing; which can be explained by Stommel's salt advection feedback. The width of the hysteresis curves varies between 0.2 and 0.5 Sv in the models. Major differences are found in the location of present-day cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

25
393
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(421 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(33 reference statements)
25
393
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The state-of-the-art climate models used for the IPCC projections [29] cannot be used to study the last million years of Earth's history, not only because they are too computationally expensive, but because they do not take into the right considerations the processes which dominate the Earth dynamics on such long time scales. On the other hand, Earth Models of Intermediate complexity [9,23], which are tailored for such problems, are definitely not competitive if our aim is to describe the variability of the present climate and the short-term climate change. The problem of providing a satisfactory description of the dynamical processes that cannot be explicitly be represented has long been addressed at various levels of rigour by the climate community [20,31,11,10,3,28,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state-of-the-art climate models used for the IPCC projections [29] cannot be used to study the last million years of Earth's history, not only because they are too computationally expensive, but because they do not take into the right considerations the processes which dominate the Earth dynamics on such long time scales. On the other hand, Earth Models of Intermediate complexity [9,23], which are tailored for such problems, are definitely not competitive if our aim is to describe the variability of the present climate and the short-term climate change. The problem of providing a satisfactory description of the dynamical processes that cannot be explicitly be represented has long been addressed at various levels of rigour by the climate community [20,31,11,10,3,28,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavily parametrized 'simple' models often capture numerous equilibria, hysteresis and abrupt changes [1], but for full-complexity models of the type used in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, the results are different [127]. Multiple equilibria and hysteresis have rarely been seen in fullcomplexity models with notable exceptions [134], and therefore may be mere artefacts of simpler models.…”
Section: (D) Comparisons Between Modelling and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are important differences between models for key characteristics of the climate such as the sensitivity of ocean circulation to freshwater input in the North Atlantic [1]. Such model-dependent features indicate an important sensitivity to model boundary conditions for these abrupt changes in climate that is yet to be fully understood.…”
Section: (D) Comparisons Between Modelling and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6] This is very hard or impossible to do with large, complex systems, such as the climate, so one may instead build models of varying complexity and perform experiments on these models instead. 7,8 A third approach is to look at the statistics of some measurable variable of the system, usually a time series of this variable, as these may reveal something about the future behaviour without the need for a detailed model of the system. [1][2][3] All three approaches are potentially useful sources of information, particularly when taken together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%