1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1979.tb00241.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoluminescence Dating: Beta‐dose Attenuation in Quartz Grains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
405
1
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 828 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
405
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These concentrations are used to estimate an environmental dose rate from the gamma and beta components of the decay chains for 40 K, 232 Th, 238 U, using the attenuation factors estimated by Adamiec & Aitken (1998), with corrections for water content (Zimmerman 1971) and grain size Mejdahl (1979). We estimate a cosmic ray dose rate based on data reported by Prescott & Hutton (1994), accounting for the geomagnetic latitude and elevation along with the density and thickness of the overburden.…”
Section: A P P E N D I X a : O P T I C A L Ly S T I M U L At E D L U mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concentrations are used to estimate an environmental dose rate from the gamma and beta components of the decay chains for 40 K, 232 Th, 238 U, using the attenuation factors estimated by Adamiec & Aitken (1998), with corrections for water content (Zimmerman 1971) and grain size Mejdahl (1979). We estimate a cosmic ray dose rate based on data reported by Prescott & Hutton (1994), accounting for the geomagnetic latitude and elevation along with the density and thickness of the overburden.…”
Section: A P P E N D I X a : O P T I C A L Ly S T I M U L At E D L U mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 and 42). Beta dose attenuation was calculated using Mejdahl (1979). Based on these data, the average dose rates for grain sizes of 4-11 µm and 45-63 µm were calculated (see Table 2).…”
Section: Dose Rate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cosmic-ray dose was calculated according to standard data reported by Prescott and Hutton (1994), taking into account sample depth and overburden density, along with the geomagnetic position of the site (latitude, longitude and altitude). Estimates of radionuclide concentrations were converted to dose rates according to conversion factors proposed by Adamiec and Aitken (1998), using corrections for grain size (Mejdahl 1979) and water content (Zimmermann 1971). The past water content of the sediments may, for short times, have deviated from the modern field values but the present moisture contents (ranging from 0.5-1.5%) may be considered to represent a good indication of the average water content of the samples throughout their burial history.…”
Section: Osl Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%