1981
DOI: 10.1139/v81-123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermolysis of the tricyclic 1,2-dioxetanes 3,4:3,4-dipropano-, 3,4-pentano-3,4-propano-, and 3,4-butano-3,4-propano-1,2-dioxetane

Abstract: . Can. J. Chem. 59,851 (1981). The title compounds have been isolated in crystalline form by cyclization of the corresponding bromo-or iodohydroperoxides.The activation parameters for thermolysis are, respectively (E,, kcallmol, AS*, eu): 25.6 f. 0.6,4 f. 2; 29.8 f. 0.4,4 f. 2; 26.3 f 0.5, 1 f 2. Thesinglet '4 and triplet '4 excited state product yieldsproduced on thermolysisofthese compounds are, respectively: 0.01 1, 0.10; 0.0019,O. 18; 0.0013,O. 11. These yields are relative to a value of0.31 for '4 oftetra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, and more importantly, the considerably lower yields (Φ T = 1%). 40,41 observed in the decomposition of the tricyclic 1,2-dioxetane 33 (Scheme 3C) might be rationalized by the impossibility of C-C-bond rotation in this derivative, even when this bond is considerably elongated, due to conformational restrictions introduced by the two condensed cyclohexyl rings. Additionally, this derivative shows very low thermal stability even so its peroxidic ring shows small dihedral angle (ω ~ 8 o ), indicating again that the dihedral angle alone is not an indicative for stability and also showing that dioxetane decomposition must not necessarily proceed by C-C-bond rotation, however this movement might be necessary for efficient excited state formation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, and more importantly, the considerably lower yields (Φ T = 1%). 40,41 observed in the decomposition of the tricyclic 1,2-dioxetane 33 (Scheme 3C) might be rationalized by the impossibility of C-C-bond rotation in this derivative, even when this bond is considerably elongated, due to conformational restrictions introduced by the two condensed cyclohexyl rings. Additionally, this derivative shows very low thermal stability even so its peroxidic ring shows small dihedral angle (ω ~ 8 o ), indicating again that the dihedral angle alone is not an indicative for stability and also showing that dioxetane decomposition must not necessarily proceed by C-C-bond rotation, however this movement might be necessary for efficient excited state formation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…and H.H. in Germany using the method described in the literature . Spectra and gas chromatography showed the product to have greater than 98% purity.…”
Section: Experimental and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3aS p ,7aR p )-7a-Hydroxyoctahydro-4H-inden-4-one (32). 25 To a stirred solution of 31 (200 mg, 1.01 mmol) dissolved in acetonitrile (4 ml) was added water (4 ml) and sodium bromate (228 mg, 1.51 mmol). The mixture was heated at 708C and solid CAN (16 mg, 3 mol%) was added.…”
Section: Stoichiometric Can Mediated Deprotections (Typical Procedure)mentioning
confidence: 99%