2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.15603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermomagnetic effect in a two-dimensional electron system with an asymmetric quantizing potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) together with Eqs. (10), (14), or (17) which demonstrate that the sign and magnitude of w SIA are determined by the products z ν1 ξ ν1 . The products are non-zero to the extent of asymmetry of the confinement potential and/or the doping profile and vanish for the absolutely symmetrical structure, where u(z) is an even function and ϕ ν is either even or odd function with respect to the QW center.…”
Section: Scattering By Optical Phononsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…(6) together with Eqs. (10), (14), or (17) which demonstrate that the sign and magnitude of w SIA are determined by the products z ν1 ξ ν1 . The products are non-zero to the extent of asymmetry of the confinement potential and/or the doping profile and vanish for the absolutely symmetrical structure, where u(z) is an even function and ϕ ν is either even or odd function with respect to the QW center.…”
Section: Scattering By Optical Phononsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Particularly, it takes place in nanostructures without an inversion center in the presence of a magnetic field, including asymmetric quantum wells, [9][10][11][12][13] chiral carbon nanotubes, [14][15][16] hybrid semiconductor/ferromagnet nanostructures, 17 and so on. For definiteness, let us consider such a simple nanostructure as a quantum well (QW).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L(= 5µm) and ξ(≈ 100µm) are the device length and thermal relaxation length in high-mobility GaAs/AlGaAs systems [24,26], respectively. For electrical transport, we have used a standard ac/dc technique to measure both linear response conductivity (G 1,6 (V ds = 0)) and non-equilibrium differential conductivity (dI(V ds )/dV ), where V ds is the drain-source bias.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%