2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of winery effluents in a two-stage process and the effect of the feeding frequency on methane production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VFAs were subsequently consumed by methanogens as the anaerobic processes continued. Acetic acid had the highest concentration in the VFAs [16,20], and its fluctuation caused the variation of total VFA concentrations. Less frequent feeding led to wider fluctuations of pH and VFA concentrations during the feeding intervals [12].…”
Section: System Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VFAs were subsequently consumed by methanogens as the anaerobic processes continued. Acetic acid had the highest concentration in the VFAs [16,20], and its fluctuation caused the variation of total VFA concentrations. Less frequent feeding led to wider fluctuations of pH and VFA concentrations during the feeding intervals [12].…”
Section: System Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-treatment reactor (R4) had an average CH 4 content and daily biogas production of 52.5% and 3.64 L•d −1 , respectively, which indicated that incompletely digested materials in digestate from R1, R2, and R3. Therefore, appropriately reducing the feeding frequency can increase the biogas performance of AD [20], and help meet the demand for "flexible gas production".…”
Section: Biogas Production and Ch 4 Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, condition 4 consisted of the same con guration and temperatures as condition 3 but with an increment in the organic loading rate (OLR) for both reactors (A4-M4) (Table 1). The start-up conditions and the acidogenic and methanogenic performances were previously reported [3,7]. The single-stage system (M1) and the acidogenic reactors (A2, A3, and A4) were fed with untreated winery e uents.…”
Section: Anaerobic Digestion Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rst effect of this change in operating conditions was a signi cant increase in methane production. However, after this increase in productivity, it was reported that the process suffered instability and overloading, gradually reducing the process e ciency [7]. Therefore, it can be inferred that applying harsher operating conditions affects the resilience and stability of the process through the loss of microbial communities.…”
Section: Taxonomic Pro Le M3 Vs M4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation