1970
DOI: 10.1126/science.168.3934.1008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoresponsiveness of the Preoptic Region of the Brain in House Sparrows

Abstract: Heating the preoptic region of the house sparrow caused the bird to decrease its metabolism and to decrease its body temperature, whereas cooling that region caused an increase in metabolism and an increase in body temperature. These responses indicate that the preoptic region of birds, like that of other vertebrates, is an important center for thermoregulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if HSF2 is involved in the regulation of proteostasis capacity, it could be activated at least during mild heat shock at physiological temperatures. The body temperature in avians is around 41°C (Mills and Heath, 1970; Aschoff et al , 1973), but it is <38°C in mammals, including humans (Mackowiak, 1998). Therefore chicken DT40 cells and mouse fibroblasts maintained at 37°C were treated with mild heat shock at 41 and 40°C, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if HSF2 is involved in the regulation of proteostasis capacity, it could be activated at least during mild heat shock at physiological temperatures. The body temperature in avians is around 41°C (Mills and Heath, 1970; Aschoff et al , 1973), but it is <38°C in mammals, including humans (Mackowiak, 1998). Therefore chicken DT40 cells and mouse fibroblasts maintained at 37°C were treated with mild heat shock at 41 and 40°C, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, as in mammals, brain temperature is generally considered to be of particular significance in thermoregulation (see Saalfeld, 1936;Mills & Heath, 1970), and the stability of brain temperature is presumably of importance for many other functions controlled by the central nervous C. ASCHOFF AND OTHERS system. While small artificial changes of hypothalamic temperature can result in large changes in either heat production or heat loss, larger spontaneous fluctuations in brain temperature seem to have comparatively little influence on the same two thermoregulatory effector systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to maintaining the endogenous time-keeping apparatus, the neuroendocrine mechanism apparently adjusts the temperature cycle in response to changes in the light regime. Attempting to locate the site of thermoregulation within the house sparrow, Mills and Heath (1970) demonstrated that the hypothalamic region of the brain was thermosensitive. Regulation of sparrow body temperature was accomplished through localized temperature changes induced within the hypothalamus by thermode implants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%