Theropod footprints from the Lower Cretaceous Cangxi Formation in the Northern Margin of the Sichuan Basin, China

Xing, Lida; Lockley, Martin G.; Tong, Bolin; Klein, Hendrik; Persons, W. Scott; Peng, Guangzhao; Ye, Yong; Wang, Miaoyan

doi:10.37819/biosis.002.01.0097

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Subsequently, domestic and foreign scholars have conducted surveys and research on Chinese ichnofossils, and described a large number of vertebrate footprints (Young, 1960;Zhen et al, 1989;Dong, 1992;Matsukawa, Lockley & Li, 2006;Lockley et al, 2013;Li, 2015;Xing & Lockley, 2016). Nowadays, more than 40 dinosaur ichnogenera from about 60 localities have been reported in China, most of which are located in the Sichuan and Shandong Provinces (Chen et al, 2006;Lockley & Matsukawa, 2009;Lockley et al, 2013;Li, 2015;Xing, Lockley & Zhang, 2017;Xing et al, 2020;Xing et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The largest theropod track site in Yunnan, China: a footprint assemblage from the Lower Jurassic Fengjiahe Formation

Fabrègues

et al. 2021

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Yunnan Province is famous for its diversified Lufeng vertebrate faunas containing many saurischian dinosaur remains. In addition to the body fossil record, dinosaur ichnofossils have also been discovered in Yunnan, and the number of published track sites is on the rise. We report a theropod assemblage from the Lower Jurassic Fengjiahe Formation in Xiyang, central Yunnan. It is the third report and description of dinosaur footprints from the Fengjiahe Formation, and this new track site is the largest in number of footprints for theropods in Yunnan. Over one hundred footprints are preserved on different layers of a claystone-dominated succession close to the Lower-Middle Jurassic boundary. The track area is referred to as a lacustrine shallow-water paleoenvironment. Tracks vary in size, morphology, and preservation. All are tridactyl and digitigrade, and some are identified as undertracks. The best preserved footprints were divided into three morphotypes: morphotype A (>8 cm–<21 cm) resembling Grallator; morphotype B (>27 cm–<30 cm) identified as Kayentapus xiaohebaensis; and morphotype C, an isolated footprint (39 cm) referred to the ichnogenus Kayentapus. Although footprint shape is influenced by many factors, biotic or abiotic, morphological differences among tracks such as size, divarication angles and proportions imply that at least three different kinds of theropods were visiting this site frequently. Theropod body fossils found in the surrounding area, such as Sinosaurus, turn out to be similar in body size to the projected size estimated from footprint lengths at the track site. In Yunnan, discoveries of theropod body fossils are rare. In that respect, the track record is a useful diversity indicator which can help to encompass theropod diversity patterns. Broadly speaking, large predators (five meters long or more) were uncommon in Early Jurassic ecosystems. Accordingly, large tracks are scarce on the track site, but not absent. Trackmakers of all sizes presumably coexisted in this tropical Jurassic ecosystem, and were regularly drawn to the track site in search of water or food resources.

show abstract