2009
DOI: 10.9793/elsj.26.1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theta-Marking via Agree

Abstract: This paper investigates the mechanism of θ-marking. Given the feature approach to θ-marking that states that θ-marking is performed by the general mechanism of feature checking, I will propose that θ-marking takes place via Agree, and provide conceptual and empirical arguments in favor of this view of θ-marking, based on data from control constructions in English and Japanese that indicate that a controller is θ-marked in the embedded [Spec, C] (precisely, [Spec, Fin]) by a matrix predicate.*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I have argued that a logical predicate on a functional head Hon can select its argument via Agree. This is similar to the idea proposed by Hornstein 1999 and subsequent works (Funakoshi 2009, Larson 2011, Saab 2015) that θ$$ \theta $$ roles are syntactic features assigned to nominal arguments by verbs under some locality. However, I am not committed to extending the current proposal to selection by lexical verbal predicates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…I have argued that a logical predicate on a functional head Hon can select its argument via Agree. This is similar to the idea proposed by Hornstein 1999 and subsequent works (Funakoshi 2009, Larson 2011, Saab 2015) that θ$$ \theta $$ roles are syntactic features assigned to nominal arguments by verbs under some locality. However, I am not committed to extending the current proposal to selection by lexical verbal predicates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…TP) within pseudo-small clause complements. 22 I assume yooni is a Force head (Funakoshi 2009). That this construction patterns with the pseudo-small clause construction in other respects is shown by the following examples:…”
Section: (63)mentioning
confidence: 99%