2010
DOI: 10.1080/0305764x.2010.481382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘They call me wonder woman’: the job jurisdictions and work‐related learning of higher level teaching assistants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the increase served the purpose of restructuring the way teachers work through the remodelling and modernisation of the school workforce. This remodelling agenda redefined job jurisdiction between teachers and their assistants by creating professional overlap between similar roles, such as taking full classes and planning for lessons (Hancock et al 2010).…”
Section: Classroom Support and Inclusion In Englandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the increase served the purpose of restructuring the way teachers work through the remodelling and modernisation of the school workforce. This remodelling agenda redefined job jurisdiction between teachers and their assistants by creating professional overlap between similar roles, such as taking full classes and planning for lessons (Hancock et al 2010).…”
Section: Classroom Support and Inclusion In Englandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In England, for example, the deployment of TAs and higher level teaching assistants (HLTAs), the latter having gained a status enabling them to plan lessons and take whole classes, is complicated by the still unresolved debate on the limits and appropriateness of how to identify SEN (Florian et al 2006;Department for Education [DfE] 2011;Ofsted 2010Ofsted , 2011; the fairness with which financial, material, intellectual and human resources are made available and distributed (Wiebe-Berry 2008); the limitations and/or purpose of deploying additional adults (Blatchford et al 2009a;Farrell et al 2010;Webster et al 2010); and the fairness of their deployment, employment and training opportunities (Cajkler et al 2007;Devecchi and Rouse 2010;Farrell, Balshaw, and Polat 1999;Hancock, Cable, and Eyres 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In its document, ‘Working with teaching assistants: a good practice guide’, which is intended to inform school professionals, the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) define TAs' role as fourfold, involving ‘supporting pupils, teachers, the school and the curriculum’ (DfES, 2003b, p. 8). However, many researchers have found that the tasks required to be undertaken by TAs in meeting the four components of their role are too numerous to be completed within the constraints of the school day (Devecchi and Rouse, ; Gerschel, ; Hancock, Hall and Cable et al., ). The recent Deployment and Impact of Support Staff (DISS) project (Blatchford et al., ) identified six categories of TA tasks in schools: Support for teachers and/or the curriculum Direct learning support for pupils Direct pastoral support for pupils Indirect support for pupils Support for the school (administrative/communicative) Support for the school (physical environment) (p. 76). …”
Section: Tas – a Complex And Shifting Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Black‐Hawkins () explains: ‘the inclusion of a child in a school has little meaning unless s/he also experiences achievement, and that child is unlikely to achieve unless s/he are included.’ (p. 27). If TAs' impact on pupils' learning is to be fully understood, TAs' influence on the process of social inclusion requires investigation (Hancock et al., ).…”
Section: The Influence Of Tas On Pupils' Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, findings confirm a potential for messiness of identity construction through ‘fuzzy occupational boundaries’ (Hancock et al . , p. 108). However, at Knightcote this does not appear to dilute any degree of professionalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%