Thiamine status of lake trout in lake Ontario and its relation to diet after the colonization of round goby, 2005–2006

Fitzsimons, John D.; Lantry, Brian F.; Honeyfield, Dale C.; O’Gorman, Robert; Rush, Scott A.; Sitar, Shawn P.

doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2021.11.009

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Understanding the processes driving recruitment variability is a key knowledge gap for the conservation of cisco and lake whitefish populations (Council of Lake Committees, 2018; Ebener et al, 2021; Fitzsimons & O'Gorman, 2006; Zimmerman & Krueger, 2009). There is limited understanding of why recruitment is sporadic or declining for many populations of cisco and lake whitefish whereas it is consistent or improving for others.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Larval cisco and lake whitefish exhibit high distributional overlap within nursery areas

Brown,

Rudstam,

Holden

et al. 2023

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coregonine fishes, including lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and cisco (C. artedi), are socioecologically important in the Laurentian Great Lakes and of conservation concern, but the processes driving recruitment variability are unclear. In Lake Ontario, cisco and lake whitefish exhibit similar spawning behaviours and early life histories, but population trajectories are diverging. One hypothesis is that sympatric cisco and lake whitefish larvae occupy distinct habitats and experience dissimilar local environmental conditions, despite co‐occurrence within nursery areas. We described the spatiotemporal distributions of larval cisco and lake whitefish among multiple Lake Ontario embayment nursery areas, characterised physical habitat features associated with their distributions, determined the degree of spatial habitat partitioning between species and evaluated how habitat niche divergence occurred along an ontogenetic progression. Both species were widely distributed across larval nursery areas, though lake whitefish were less abundant and more narrowly distributed than cisco. Within the yolk sac stage, lake whitefish occupied more nearshore, shallower and colder waters than cisco, indicating potential habitat niche partitioning between congeners. However, distributional differences were subtle and likely driven by differential hatch timing and staggered ontogenetic habitat shifts. Combined, our results illustrate similar habitat use between cisco and lake whitefish through the larval stage and demonstrate that ontogeny and species‐specific phenology influence habitat use for these species. This study provides additional evidence that the early life histories of cisco and lake whitefish are highly similar and does not support the hypothesis that larval habitat use differences are a major driver of differential recruitment success for these species.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%