2017
DOI: 10.1080/00295639.2017.1291053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thick and Thin Target7Li(p,n)7Be Neutron Spectra Below the Three-Body Breakup Reaction Threshold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the proton beam is continuous and therefore time of flight technique could not be employed to evaluate the neutron flux energy spectrum [19]. To resolve these two concerns, we have used EPEN (Energy of Proton Energy of Neutron) [20], a simulation code, to obtain the neutron flux energy spectrum. The code is designed for incident proton energies from 1.88 to 7 MeV.…”
Section: Neutron Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the proton beam is continuous and therefore time of flight technique could not be employed to evaluate the neutron flux energy spectrum [19]. To resolve these two concerns, we have used EPEN (Energy of Proton Energy of Neutron) [20], a simulation code, to obtain the neutron flux energy spectrum. The code is designed for incident proton energies from 1.88 to 7 MeV.…”
Section: Neutron Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simulation of the neutron spectrum and intensity at the sample is required for optimizing the experimental assembly. Several Monte-Carlo simulation codes for the 7 Li(p, n) neutron yields exist [12][13][14][15]. In this paper we use the SimLiT code [13].…”
Section: Optimizing Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we use the SimLiT code [13]. The SimLiT code was compared to experimental data at E p = 1912 keV and E p = 2000 keV [13], and to other simulations at higher energies [15]. It was also successfully used for many experiments [16].…”
Section: Optimizing Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of various level density models available in the code were also evaluated for a better description of the existing experimental data. The obtained results were compared with the Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (ENDF/B-VIII.0) [9], Joint Evaluated Fission and Fusion File (JEFF-3.3) [10], Japanese Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (JENDL-4.0) [11], and Chinese Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (CENDL-3.2) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%