2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4235-6_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness Effects on the Thermal Expansion Coefficient of ITO/PET Film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the last four samples (12.0–17.4 nm thick), the R value has a declining trend. We attribute this to the fact that thicker MoS 2 samples may have smaller TEC value just like PET (polyethylene terephthalate) film . The TEC mismatch between MoS 2 nanosheets and c-Si substrate therefore decreases.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the last four samples (12.0–17.4 nm thick), the R value has a declining trend. We attribute this to the fact that thicker MoS 2 samples may have smaller TEC value just like PET (polyethylene terephthalate) film . The TEC mismatch between MoS 2 nanosheets and c-Si substrate therefore decreases.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We attribute this to the fact that thicker MoS 2 samples may have smaller TEC value just like PET (polyethylene terephthalate) film. 63 The TEC mismatch between MoS 2 nanosheets and c-Si substrate therefore decreases. As a result, the local interface spacing increase during experiment will become smaller than the thinner samples, leading to a better interface energy coupling.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%