1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(98)00030-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness Measurement of a Curved Multilayered Polymer System by Using an Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the ultrasonic has advantages such as good directivity, strong penetrating power, high energy, and it can not be limited by checked material, so the ultrasonic detection method has become the focus in the coating thickness nondestructive testing.But due to the coating thickness is too thin, generally in micron, and it lead to the ratio between the ultrasonic wave and thickness is small, the coating ultrasonic of different interface echo affects each other, and make it more difficult to process the signal, therefore the applied base material thickness method is no longer applicable, it must design special ultrasonic testing system and information processing system.The ultrasonic thickness of coating methods mainly include pulse echo method [1], lamb wave method [2] and surface wave method [3], and so on. Pulse echo method is affected by the material surface roughness and the acoustic attenuation, and when the medium thickness is smaller than the double wavelength, the echo of medium surface will be mixed up together, so it is not easy to distinguish.…”
Section: The Thickness Of the Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the ultrasonic has advantages such as good directivity, strong penetrating power, high energy, and it can not be limited by checked material, so the ultrasonic detection method has become the focus in the coating thickness nondestructive testing.But due to the coating thickness is too thin, generally in micron, and it lead to the ratio between the ultrasonic wave and thickness is small, the coating ultrasonic of different interface echo affects each other, and make it more difficult to process the signal, therefore the applied base material thickness method is no longer applicable, it must design special ultrasonic testing system and information processing system.The ultrasonic thickness of coating methods mainly include pulse echo method [1], lamb wave method [2] and surface wave method [3], and so on. Pulse echo method is affected by the material surface roughness and the acoustic attenuation, and when the medium thickness is smaller than the double wavelength, the echo of medium surface will be mixed up together, so it is not easy to distinguish.…”
Section: The Thickness Of the Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to detecting structural defects, the ultrasonic non-destructive testing methods also can be used to measure the thickness [ 5 , 6 , 7 ] or elasticity [ 8 ] of the material. Furthermore, ultrasonic flaw detection technique has been applied to food [ 9 ] and medical fields [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the many available NDT techniques, ultrasonic measurements are the most widely accepted method for evaluating adhesive joints. [18][19][20] In De Sousa et al 20 study, a multilayered system was investigated to extract the layer thickness between acoustically dissimilar materials, and the authors found a typical error of less than 7% for their isotropic materials. In the present study, acoustically similar materials are utilized, a fiber-filled thermoset bonded with an unfilled thermoset, causing difficulty in signal interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive studies have been conducted on various nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques to evaluate and analyze the adhesive bond quality. Of the many available NDT techniques, ultrasonic measurements are the most widely accepted method for evaluating adhesive joints 18–20 . In De Sousa et al 20 study, a multilayered system was investigated to extract the layer thickness between acoustically dissimilar materials, and the authors found a typical error of less than 7% for their isotropic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%