2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness Measurements of Thin Perfluoropolyether Polymer Films on Silicon and Amorphous-Hydrogenated Carbon with X-Ray Reflectivity, ESCA and Optical Ellipsometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thickness measurements of 5-35 Å thin dip-coated perfluoropolyether ͑PFPE͒ polymer films on silicon substrate and silicon substrates with 120 Å a-C:H coating were carried out by Toney et al using XRR and SE. 8 A linear least-squares fit with a slope of around 1.0 was found for PFPE films irrespective of the substrate. However, the value of the intercept for the least-squares fit line was found to be 5.3± 0.9 Å and 2.7± 1 Å for films deposited on silicon substrates and a-C : H, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thickness measurements of 5-35 Å thin dip-coated perfluoropolyether ͑PFPE͒ polymer films on silicon substrate and silicon substrates with 120 Å a-C:H coating were carried out by Toney et al using XRR and SE. 8 A linear least-squares fit with a slope of around 1.0 was found for PFPE films irrespective of the substrate. However, the value of the intercept for the least-squares fit line was found to be 5.3± 0.9 Å and 2.7± 1 Å for films deposited on silicon substrates and a-C : H, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They had attributed the nonzero intercepts to the adsorption of hydrocarbon contaminants on the native silicon oxide layer of the silicon substrates for the a-C : H surfaces. 8 In a recent attempt at metrological characterization of nanometer film thickness standards for XRR and SE applications using 6-1000 nm SiO 2 layer on Si substrate, Hasche et al 9 had reported higher values of thickness measured using SE than XRR. They had a͒ Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; electronic mail: skohli@lamar.colostate.edu also found that the XRR measurements were consistent with the thickness estimation by scanning force microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most of the experimental details of our X-ray reflectivity results and sample preparation have been discussed in earlier papers [4], [6], we describe them only briefly: In specular X-ray reflectivity, the reflected X-ray intensity is measured as a function of incidence angle and analyzed using a multilayer model incorporating several parameters-thickness and density of the lubricant film and roughness of the lubricant-air and the substrate-lubricant interfaces-that are varied to produce the best fit to the data. From this modeling, the functional form that best fits the density profile of the lubricant-air interface is an error function, implying a Gaussian distribution of surface heights.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows an example of the density profiles fitted to the X-ray reflectivity data for Zdol on a carbon overcoat. The Zdol profile exhibits a dip in density at the Zdol-carbon interface due to the adsorption of a hydrocarbon layer between the Zdol film and the carbon overcoat [6]. The Zdol-air interface is narrower than for the bare carbon surface, due to the surface tension trying to pull the liquid surface flat, but still has a finite width due to roughening by capillary waves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the bonded layer of the PFPE by dip-coating, the bonded layer made by the vacuum vapor deposition will be similar to the PFPE of monolayer. Based on the results of the XPS measurements, the thicknesses, h, of the PFPE film fixed on the DLC surface were calculated using the following equation 12) : where λ is the mean free path of the carbon atom, and I PFPE and I DLC are the area intensities of the PFPE and DLC peaks determined from the XPS measurements, respectively. We must note that when the film thickness is less than a monolayer thickness, h max , the ratio of the surface coverage, θ, related to the PFPE molecules covering with the DLC surface can be denoted, h/h max because the XPS measurement is an optical analysis and the results indicate the mean value that depended on the X-ray spot area.…”
Section: Xps Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%