2011
DOI: 10.1108/13590791211190722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thieves from within: occupational fraud in Canada

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of perpetrators of occupational fraud and their effects on organizations.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on a 2006 occupational fraud web survey conducted in Canada by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) using a multivariate regression analysis to explain the effect of perpetrators' characteristics on fraud losses.FindingsThe authors' analyses show that the perpetrator's position (i.e. employee, manager, executive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
7
4
Order By: Relevance
“…employee or manager) and rarely by external party (customers, suppliers, etc.). Similar findings were found by Krambia-Kapardis and Zopiatis (2010) and Peltier-Rivest and Lanoue (2012), where the perpetrators in most of the cases were "internal" with the vast majority of them being low-level employees. Specific studies (Gill and Goldstraw-White, 2010;Hollinger and Adams, 2006) were also carried out on employee fraud.…”
Section: Fraud Victimizationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…employee or manager) and rarely by external party (customers, suppliers, etc.). Similar findings were found by Krambia-Kapardis and Zopiatis (2010) and Peltier-Rivest and Lanoue (2012), where the perpetrators in most of the cases were "internal" with the vast majority of them being low-level employees. Specific studies (Gill and Goldstraw-White, 2010;Hollinger and Adams, 2006) were also carried out on employee fraud.…”
Section: Fraud Victimizationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Managers try to hide fraudulent transactions into other transactions to the extent possible. Further, segregation of duties (mean = 4.176) has been found as an important tool to control fraud, supporting the finding of Peltier-Rivest and Lanoue (2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It indicates operational efficiency of business organisation, confidence in annual reports and compliance with various applicable laws (Mohd-Sansui, Mohamed, Omar & Mohd-Nassir, 2015). Reinforcing such system minimises risk of collusion among employees (Peltier-Rivest & Lanoue, 2011), thus abating risk of material misstatement and fraud by employees (Caplan, 1999).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fraud has been perceived as a perpetrator’s crime to deceive others (Wells, 2008, p. 8) probably with an intention of not being detected (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2012, p. 57; Dorminey et al, 2012) with rationalisation for their misdeeds (Dorminey et al, 2012; Murphy & Dacin, 2011). Furthermore, frauds have been committed by the perpetrators in different forms such as pilferage of petty cash, stocks and cash (Gill & Goldstraw-White, 2010) mostly by employees, even by top officials, rather than by outsiders (e.g., Krambia-Kapardis & Zopiatis, 2010; Peltier-Rivest & Lanoue, 2012), creating concerns for management (Brink & Witt, 1982). Literature has documented perpetrating government officials, for example, by taking bribes (tax officials in Indonesia [Kimura, 2012] and transport officials in India [Bertrand et al, 2007]) and by taking kickbacks (in India [Davis, 2004], in Indonesia [Prabowo, 2012], in Pakistan [Bashir et al, 2011; Jalal, 1991, pp.…”
Section: Prior Studies and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%