2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin extractive membrane for monitoring actinides in aqueous streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of α radiography are given in our earlier publication. 10 Sorption and Desorption Studies. To study the extraction properties of the polymers, about 100 mg of the polymer sample was equilibrated with 5 mL of well-stirred solution containing a tracer level concentration of Pu/Am.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of α radiography are given in our earlier publication. 10 Sorption and Desorption Studies. To study the extraction properties of the polymers, about 100 mg of the polymer sample was equilibrated with 5 mL of well-stirred solution containing a tracer level concentration of Pu/Am.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of receiving solutions such as biological cultures and alkaline solutions can be employed to strip the permeated organics, maintaining the organic concentration driving force imperative for mass transfer across the membrane [11]. Therefore, to a large extent, the aqueous-aqueous extraction efficiency is determined by the mass-transfer capacity of the membrane phase [12]. The ideal characteristics of the dense membrane used for the aqueous-aqueous membrane extractive process should comprise three aspects: (1) high organophilicity to effectively extract the target organics from the aqueous feed; (2) strong hydrophobicity to completely reject water and inorganic components; and (3) low resistance to ensure efficient organic passage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seawater was collected from Juhu Beach, Mumbai, and groundwater was collected from West Bengal, India. A synthetic urine sample was prepared as per the literature . Known amounts of Pu were added to 100 mL of seawater, groundwater, and synthetic urine samples; the acidity of these samples was adjusted to 3 M HNO 3 , the samples were treated with 30% H 2 O 2 , Pu concentrations in these aqueous samples were determined by the SLM-TIMS method, employing the isotope dilution technique, and the results were compared with the conventional solution based TIMS (ID-TIMS) method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A synthetic urine sample was prepared as per the literature. 35 Known amounts of Pu were added to 100 mL of seawater, groundwater, and synthetic urine samples; the acidity of these samples was adjusted to 3 M HNO 3 , the samples were treated with 30% H 2 O 2 , Pu concentrations in these aqueous samples were determined by the SLM-TIMS method, employing the isotope dilution technique, and the results were compared with the conventional solution based TIMS (ID-TIMS) method. The principle of isotope dilution technique and choice of spike are discussed in detail in the Supporting Information (S.I.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%