2015
DOI: 10.1364/ol.40.003949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin-film filter, wavelength-locked, multi-laser cavity for dense wavelength beam combining of broad-area laser diode bars

Abstract: We report on individual wavelength locking of a multiplet of 100-μm broad-area laser diode emitters arranged on a 50% fill-factor bar by means of a single external multi-laser cavity using an ultra-narrowband thin-film filter as a dispersive optical element. The achieved wavelength-locked output power is 216 W, corresponding to an electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency of about 49.7%. The 45 emitters of the laser diode bar are stabilized within a spectral range of about 6.4 nm. Our approach is suited for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows the designed multi-layer structure of C s (Si/ SiO 2 ) 3 (SiO 2 /Si) 3 , which has been prepared on K9 optical glass (side length 2.5 cm, thickness 3 mm). The thickness of every single layer is set as follows: dH(Si) = 106.8 nm; dL(SiO 2 ) = 268.4 nm; C s = 20, 40, and 60 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1 shows the designed multi-layer structure of C s (Si/ SiO 2 ) 3 (SiO 2 /Si) 3 , which has been prepared on K9 optical glass (side length 2.5 cm, thickness 3 mm). The thickness of every single layer is set as follows: dH(Si) = 106.8 nm; dL(SiO 2 ) = 268.4 nm; C s = 20, 40, and 60 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further verify the applicability of equations ( 5) and ( 6) for our designed multi-layer structure (Si/SiO 2 ) 3 (SiO 2 / Si) 3 , we make comparisons between numerical calculation and simulation: peak transmittances T max = 1 are surprisingly consistent. FWHM by numerical calculation 3.27 (m 2 = 1, n sub = 1, λ m = 1.55 µm and x = 3) is in good agreement with the simulation value 3.2 (as shown in figure 4, by the software Essential Macleod).…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations