1995
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(94)00203-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin film II–VI photovoltaics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
77
0
13

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
77
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The straight line segments were extrapolated from the straight line to A 2 = 0 in order to estimate the energy bandgaps of the CdTe layers tabulated in Table 2 for comparison. As observed in Table 2, the bandgap of both the as-deposited and the CdCl 2 treated CdTe layers within the explored cathodic voltage range falls within 1.45 ± 0.01 eV range which is comparable with the bandgap of bulk CdTe [19]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Optical Absorption Studysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The straight line segments were extrapolated from the straight line to A 2 = 0 in order to estimate the energy bandgaps of the CdTe layers tabulated in Table 2 for comparison. As observed in Table 2, the bandgap of both the as-deposited and the CdCl 2 treated CdTe layers within the explored cathodic voltage range falls within 1.45 ± 0.01 eV range which is comparable with the bandgap of bulk CdTe [19]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Optical Absorption Studysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Figure 11a,b show the absorbance curve and the Tauc plot for electrodeposited CdTe layer. Thick layers, greater than ~1.5 µm, show E g of 1.48 eV, very close to the E g of bulk materials [18]. Thin layers usually exhibit slightly higher E g values due to incomplete surface coverage and quantum effects.…”
Section: Optical Absorption (Uv-vis)mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…eV [28], even for the as-deposited layer without any PGT to modify its optical parameters. Although, there were no clear differences in the bandgap due to the material quality of the as-deposited CdTe layer, the difference in the absorption edge is clearly observed in Figure 2 (b).…”
Section: Analysis Of Cds Layermentioning
confidence: 99%