2018
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aae3a9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin films of tin sulfides: structure, composition and optoelectronic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the binding energies at 486.5 and 495.0 eV correspond to 3d 5/2 and 3d 3/2, respectively, in Sn 3d spectrum, indicating the presence of a reduction state of Sn 3 + . [25][26][27][28] The binding energy difference between Sn 3d 5/2 and Sn 3d 3/2 is 8.4 eV, which was identical to results reported by Avellaneda et al [27] The highresolution S 2p spectrum of the S-2 sample can be split into two peaks at 161.4 and 162.6 eV, corresponding to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 , respectively, suggesting the existence of S 1.5À in the sample. [25][26][27][28] Morphologies and microstructures of these samples were studied by SEM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, the binding energies at 486.5 and 495.0 eV correspond to 3d 5/2 and 3d 3/2, respectively, in Sn 3d spectrum, indicating the presence of a reduction state of Sn 3 + . [25][26][27][28] The binding energy difference between Sn 3d 5/2 and Sn 3d 3/2 is 8.4 eV, which was identical to results reported by Avellaneda et al [27] The highresolution S 2p spectrum of the S-2 sample can be split into two peaks at 161.4 and 162.6 eV, corresponding to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 , respectively, suggesting the existence of S 1.5À in the sample. [25][26][27][28] Morphologies and microstructures of these samples were studied by SEM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Figure shows the comparison between the experimental diffraction patterns of the S‐Sn electrode and of the metallic Sn nanopowder used for material synthesis, as well as the theoretical data of elemental sulfur (red diagram) and metallic tin (blue diagram) indicated according to the powder diffraction file (PDF) numbers. The S‐Sn pattern shows reflection peaks ascribable exclusively to orthorhombic sulfur (S 8 , PDF # 85‐0799) and tetragonal tin (Sn, PDF # 86‐2265), without signs of Sn/S compounds such as SnS (tin sulfide), thus suggesting only physical mixing between the two elements without chemical reaction or impurity, as indeed expected by the low temperature adopted for the material synthesis (i.e., 120 °C). This important result excludes possible side reactions of sulfide species during the electrochemical process in the lithium cell which can affect the reversibility and the voltage shape of the material, expected instead to reflect only the reaction of sulfur with lithium .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…(a) Band gap fitting by the absorption coefficient. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2018 IOP Publishing.…”
Section: Emerging Chalcogenidesmentioning
confidence: 99%