2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin-fingered fiddler crabs display a natural preference for UV light cues but show no sensory bias to other hypertrophied claw coloration

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied von Kries transformation to normalize receptor quantum catches to the background, thus accounting for receptor adaptation ( vonkries = TRUE). The neural photoreceptor noise ( noise = ‘neural’) was set with a Weber fraction of 0.12 for crabs (Silva et al ., 2022), 0.05 for fish (Wilkins et al ., 2016), and 0.1 for birds (Olsson et al ., 2018). For the relative photoreceptor densities, we employed 1:1 for crabs, since no information about the proportion of photoreceptors is mentioned by literature, 1:2:2 for triggerfish (Champ et al ., 2014) and 1:1.9:2.7:2.7 for seagulls, based on Blue tit (Hart et al ., 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied von Kries transformation to normalize receptor quantum catches to the background, thus accounting for receptor adaptation ( vonkries = TRUE). The neural photoreceptor noise ( noise = ‘neural’) was set with a Weber fraction of 0.12 for crabs (Silva et al ., 2022), 0.05 for fish (Wilkins et al ., 2016), and 0.1 for birds (Olsson et al ., 2018). For the relative photoreceptor densities, we employed 1:1 for crabs, since no information about the proportion of photoreceptors is mentioned by literature, 1:2:2 for triggerfish (Champ et al ., 2014) and 1:1.9:2.7:2.7 for seagulls, based on Blue tit (Hart et al ., 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%