2002
DOI: 10.1109/mper.2002.4312236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin Wire Representation in Finite Difference Time Domain Surge Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce the large amount of calculation, the skin depth of the conductors was set to be zero due to the high frequency of the lightning current, and therefore only the surface of the conductors were computed. The comparison results indicate that the magnetic fields obtained by simulation are lower than that by IEC equation, which was consistent with the results in technical literature [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In order to reduce the large amount of calculation, the skin depth of the conductors was set to be zero due to the high frequency of the lightning current, and therefore only the surface of the conductors were computed. The comparison results indicate that the magnetic fields obtained by simulation are lower than that by IEC equation, which was consistent with the results in technical literature [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Unlike the lightning channel, the man-made metallic structures do not radiate and only the electric field along the respective thin wires is set to zero. Also, extra provisions should be made in the FDTD code to avoid discretization errors (Noda and Yokoyama, 2002). The well-known MPICH software (Bridges et al, 1995) is used for code parallelization procedures.…”
Section: Parallel Fdtd Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground resistivity was set to 100 ℊ·m. For the FDTD simulation, the VSTL program [12,13] was used. The analytical accuracy of the FDTD simulation was verified compared with the experimental results using the reducedscale model in the reference [9], resulted in accuracy to within around 2% or less difference at the maximum voltages.…”
Section: Analysis Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%