2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THINGS: A database of 1,854 object concepts and more than 26,000 naturalistic object images

Abstract: In recent years, the use of a large number of object concepts and naturalistic object images has been growing strongly in cognitive neuroscience research. Classical databases of object concepts are based mostly on a manually curated set of concepts. Further, databases of naturalistic object images typically consist of single images of objects cropped from their background, or a large number of naturalistic images of varying quality, requiring elaborate manual image curation. Here we provide a set of 1,854 dive… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
165
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we needed to identify a set of objects that is representative of the objects encountered in the real world. For that purpose, we chose the 1,854 objects in the THINGS database 17 , which we developed to provide a comprehensive list of living and non-living things according to their everyday use in the American English language. For each object, we chose a representative image that had been shown to be named consistently during the creation of this database.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we needed to identify a set of objects that is representative of the objects encountered in the real world. For that purpose, we chose the 1,854 objects in the THINGS database 17 , which we developed to provide a comprehensive list of living and non-living things according to their everyday use in the American English language. For each object, we chose a representative image that had been shown to be named consistently during the creation of this database.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to considering behavioural measures, model representations can be evaluated against high-quality neuroimaging studies in which participants view naturalistic images (e.g. Hebart et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecoset was created as a large-scale image resource for deep learning and human visual neuroscience more generally (see ref. 43 for a related dataset designed for experimental work in psychology and neuroscience). A total of 565 categories were selected based on the following: 1) their word frequency in American television and film subtitles (SUBTLEX_US, 10), 2) the perceived concreteness by human observers ( 11 ), and 3) the availability of a minimum of 700 images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%