Women in Management: Current Research Issues Volume II 2000
DOI: 10.4135/9781446219775.n7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Think Career Global, but Act Local: Understanding Networking as a Culturally Differentiated Career Skill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women join networks to help personal skills development, to meet others who could help with their careers and for social contacts, indicating a mixture of instrumental and expressive ties. Women rate the psychological benefits of network membership more highly than career support and prefer single-sex networks (Travers and Pemberton, 2000), though this contrasts with the author's preliminary findings that senior women in the cohort expressed a preference for mixed gender networks with a business focus, though this may simply be a reflection of the gender structure. Women have been found to engage in both formal and informal networking to a greater extent than their male colleagues but the association between participating in network activities and career satisfaction, although associated with more career satisfaction for both genders, is significantly stronger for men than for women (Van Emmerik et al, 2006).…”
Section: Why Women Networkmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Women join networks to help personal skills development, to meet others who could help with their careers and for social contacts, indicating a mixture of instrumental and expressive ties. Women rate the psychological benefits of network membership more highly than career support and prefer single-sex networks (Travers and Pemberton, 2000), though this contrasts with the author's preliminary findings that senior women in the cohort expressed a preference for mixed gender networks with a business focus, though this may simply be a reflection of the gender structure. Women have been found to engage in both formal and informal networking to a greater extent than their male colleagues but the association between participating in network activities and career satisfaction, although associated with more career satisfaction for both genders, is significantly stronger for men than for women (Van Emmerik et al, 2006).…”
Section: Why Women Networkmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The findings of our study suggest that for female managers, the benefits derived from being part of a network group are more significant than for those managers who have not had the experience of mentoring relationships. The importance of networking as a critical factor for individual career progression and success is a continuing theme within the current research literature (Crampton and Mishra, 1999;Travers and Pemberton, 2000;Garavan et al, 2003;Harris, 2006). A number of significant advantages are afforded to an individual through networking.…”
Section: The Role Of Networking In the Development Of Female Global Mmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is also evidence to suggest that women are often excluded from both formal and informal networks (for example, Coe, 1992; Charlesworth, 1997; O'Leary and Ickovics, 1992; Ohlott et al ., 1994; Travers and Pemberton, 2000) which negatively impacts on their ability to accumulate both human and social capital. Studies also indicate that women have historically faced exclusion from access to important organizational circles (Kanter, 1977; O'Leary and Ickovics, 1992; Powell and Mainiero, 1992; Ragins and Sundstrom, 1989).…”
Section: Gender and Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%