2016
DOI: 10.1080/17400201.2015.1119106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking and caring about indigenous peoples’ human rights: Swedish students writing history beyond scholarly debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When close reading the answers to a question asking pupils to corroborate sources describing the situation of Jews, Romani-and Sámi people in the seventeenth-century Sweden it is evident that corroboration stands out as a springboard for further comparison, judging and compassion, present-past discussion as well as perspective recognition and more general conclusions. In contrast to previous research (Nygren, 2016b;Nygren et al, 2014;Wineburg, 1998Wineburg, , 2001, scrutinising sources in terms of corroboration not only stays an "inner cognitive process" and a habit of mind, but is being reflected in textual coverage as well. Even if the current national syllabus for history underlines the importance of evaluating sources we find that this is not part of pupils' corroboration and of sources.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When close reading the answers to a question asking pupils to corroborate sources describing the situation of Jews, Romani-and Sámi people in the seventeenth-century Sweden it is evident that corroboration stands out as a springboard for further comparison, judging and compassion, present-past discussion as well as perspective recognition and more general conclusions. In contrast to previous research (Nygren, 2016b;Nygren et al, 2014;Wineburg, 1998Wineburg, , 2001, scrutinising sources in terms of corroboration not only stays an "inner cognitive process" and a habit of mind, but is being reflected in textual coverage as well. Even if the current national syllabus for history underlines the importance of evaluating sources we find that this is not part of pupils' corroboration and of sources.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Scrutinising the source also become important when dealing with debated topics like the history of minorities. The design of the national test may also separate sourcing from other aspects of historical thinking and caring, but this split need to be further investigated since it is also evident in some previous research (Nygren, 2016b;Rosenlund, 2016). Noting the credibility of the source is central when navigating the past and present.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations